Live data from Hacker News

ZeroFS vs. Amazon S3 Files

zerofs.net

1–10 of 34 posts

Re: ZeroFS vs. Amazon S3 Files

#6

I really want this, but it feels a little scary to trust all my files. I wouls like it if there was some contineous suite trying to corrupt the files and then see the failure cases!

That’s a fair concern. The closest thing right now is a deterministic simulation suite that injects storage faults and crashes at arbitrary points, then checks the recovered data against reference models. It runs hourly with fresh seeds.

CI also runs pjdfstest, xfstests, stress-ng, ZFS scrubs, and Jepsen crash/failover tests: https://github.com/Barre/ZeroFS#testing

ZeroFS is still pretty young as storage projects go, so I completely understand wanting to see it prove itself over time.

Re: ZeroFS vs. Amazon S3 Files

#8

Author here. Thanks for posting this! It’s been quite a ride building ZeroFS, and I’m happy to answer any questions.

Thanks for building this, I am just about to give it ago with my self-hosted Garage cluster.

Does running `stat` against a file require pulling the whole file from s3, or can that be handled by the metadata?

Do you know what backup performance is like for something like borg/borgmatic or restic, especially on follow up runs where most files are just checked.

Is there any particular Redis/Valkey config you recommend when using it for `conditional_put`, or just default config?

Is there any chance for NFSv4 support?

Post reply on HN