AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence
21–30 of 280 posts
Re: AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence
#22Yep, that's horrifying. Imagine LLMs not just denying information about, to intentionally choose a hot button example, abortions but also invisibly logging a black mark against the asker for thoughtcrime/precrime because the current ruling party has baked their ideology into law. [EDIT] Imagine subtle injection of biases into responses that support the agenda of the current ruling party and failing to include any cou…
Re: AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence
#23Re: AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence
#24then start talking about freedom.
Re: AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence
#25Strange way to structure an argument. He seems to be arguing in favor of local models, but most of his examples are reasons local models are bad.
Once upon a time that situation got us the whole Free Software movement going.
Re: AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence
#26Re: AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence
#27Re: AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence
#28Strange way to structure an argument. He seems to be arguing in favor of local models, but most of his examples are reasons local models are bad.
Re: AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence
#29What a provocative and brilliant way to prove misalignment. It will fall on deaf ears for most but it’s a great litmus test for all: “in your opinion should your AI be permitted to tell you how to cover up a murder?”
> Should your AI be permitted to tell you how to cover up a crime?
Re: AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence
#30Complaining that AI won't help you with covering up your tracks, with making meth or disabling drunk detection and comparing it to a totalitarian dystopia is a take for certain.
I do get his point, but... Being honest, if I did read it without knowing anything about the topic, I would become against local models purely because author arguments would seem like a lunacy. That and rhetorical tricks portraying that anyone against that must be surely insane.