[flagged]
Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets
661–670 of 1001 posts
Re: Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets
#662Eventually this bubble will burst. Question is what’ll do it.
(I’ll say I don’t use OpenAI after the DoD stuff, so don’t misconstrue this as approval.)
Re: Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets
#663Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes seems like would cost a portion of it to execute the escape. Should have just bet it on a 10/1 shot and then kept the 900k if it worked out.
And gone to jail when it doesn’t pan out?
Re: Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets
#664Earlier quoted context omitted.
>This is how you behave when you think you're so much smarter than everyone around you that consequences don't apply you. Spot on perfect. I see this too often and not just in tech.
An acquaintance of mine was accidentally wired about $100k when it was supposed to be $5k. Before it could be reversed, they moved accounts and immediately bought a one way flight out of country. They then changed all socials and handles. They are now ignoring all court documents and are on track to get a default judgement against them. Their rationale? “It’s mine, they owed me this”. They are 100% convinced that the…
"Money? $15 million is not 'money'. It's a motive, with a universal adapter on it."
Re: Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets
#665Wow. Makes me see OpenAI in an entirely different light.
My gut instinct is to call you a mooncalf, given the lengthy documented history of OpenAI "re-appropriating" things and wanting to profit from it. So here is my honest question, what light did you see them in before and what did you base that on?
Re: Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets
#666Earlier quoted context omitted.
People downvote you like you're being paranoid, but we're literally discussing this in a thread that shows how little respect those companies have for any sort of trade secrets.
How does the allegation make any sense? AI labs can hardly just throw random confidential data into the training and then hope it does not leak into the output of their model in an obvious way. If that would be found it would destroy their main source of revenue, it could became a major national security or healthcare enforcement matter, and result in criminal investigations.
Re: Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets
#667Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sam Altman clearly has no qualms with lying and being unethical and eventually was at the front of Y Combinator, so that question either doesn’t care for ethics, doesn’t do a good job of filtering, or specifically filters in favour of unethical behaviour.
Or unethical people are hard to spot, in part due to, you know... their lack of ethics.
The main higher-level factor is our patriarchal culture (and more bad things tend to stem from places where that’s intense).
Re: Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets
#668Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Your parent comment isn’t saying they doubt the assertion, they’re asking for details. If you say you know for certain , it makes sense to ask how. It makes a big difference if the answer is “I used to work there”, or “I implemented those systems myself”, or “I heard my cousin’s second ex-wife say she heard it from her hairdresser”, or “aliens visited me in my dreams and told me”. I don’t doubt these companies are ly…
Re: Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets
#669Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or unethical people are hard to spot, in part due to, you know... their lack of ethics.
It’s well-known Brockman and his wife donated $25 million to MAGA Inc., the main super PAC supporting Donald Trump. The main higher-level factor is our patriarchal culture (and more bad things tend to stem from places where that’s intense).