Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

zdnet.com

231–240 of 1001 posts

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#231

When Starlink first became available here in poor-ish Central-EU, I was excited. Then, only months later, but after years of planning: EU funding brought fiber to my farm area, at ~$25/900mbps 10ms. While my story is just n=1, I don't understand the huge upside for Starlink outside of Africa or India, where they have However, I am dumb, and very open to be convinced.

This is a military tech.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

light pollution already means the night sky is largely invisible outside of remote areas

“Remote areas” make up most of the world.

Weighting by population seems reasonable here!

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“You can’t see it most places so who cares if it goes away” is my most charitable interpretation of this.

I've never seen a glacier before, have you?

Yeah. Hiked on and around them in PNW mountains.

And?

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#234

When Starlink first became available here in poor-ish Central-EU, I was excited. Then, only months later, but after years of planning: EU funding brought fiber to my farm area, at ~$25/900mbps 10ms. While my story is just n=1, I don't understand the huge upside for Starlink outside of Africa or India, where they have However, I am dumb, and very open to be convinced.

> I don't understand the huge upside for Starlink outside of Africa or India, where they have India is rapidly expanding fiber internet connectivity, even in rural areas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bharat_Broadband_Network In addition, 4G/5G coverage is extensive: https://www.ookla.com/articles/india-mobile-connectivity-1h2... See India in this 5G global coverage map: https://www.ookla.com/articles/5g-map-2026 The…

Starlink accounted for 69% of SpaceX revenue pre-merger and is speculated to be already profitable including launch costs.

And this is all before they launch a phone or something, or replace global fiber interconnect with a lower latency space-based alternative, replace all forms of space based telecommunications (TV, Satellite Radio, etc). Starlink is a $1T+ business without even getting creative.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#235

Will this be the last generation to remember the night sky?

If you don't take long exposures, the satellites won't cause you much trouble seeing the stars. Regular light pollution is the problem.

Sucks for regular astronomy then, where long exposures are the norm.

Equally sucks for radio astronomy where the bloody things leak into spectrums they (Starlink) pinky promised to keep clean. And successive generations have worsened the problem, again despite promises to improve.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#236

Will this be the last generation to remember the night sky?

If you don't take long exposures, the satellites won't cause you much trouble seeing the stars. Regular light pollution is the problem.

They don't stop you from seeing the stars, but I find them very distracting. Makes the experience of looking up at the stars on a quiet night less peaceful, I find.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#237

Will this be the last generation to remember the night sky?

Satellites only reflect sunlight when in sunlight. This only happens near sunrise and sunset.

The night sky will be unaffected by satellites for the foreseeable future.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#238

Will this be the last generation to remember the night sky?

Satellites only reflect sunlight when in sunlight . This only happens near sunrise and sunset. The night sky will be unaffected by satellites for the foreseeable future.

You forgot about the radio spectrum pollution which affects the night and day sky right now .. and for the foreseeable future given the lack of progress in addressing that leakage.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#239

When Starlink first became available here in poor-ish Central-EU, I was excited. Then, only months later, but after years of planning: EU funding brought fiber to my farm area, at ~$25/900mbps 10ms. While my story is just n=1, I don't understand the huge upside for Starlink outside of Africa or India, where they have However, I am dumb, and very open to be convinced.

Surely funding cell towers in Africa / India is cheaper and easier to maintain than 100k satellites in space.

[deleted]

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#240
post #17

When Starlink first became available here in poor-ish Central-EU, I was excited. Then, only months later, but after years of planning: EU funding brought fiber to my farm area, at ~$25/900mbps 10ms. While my story is just n=1, I don't understand the huge upside for Starlink outside of Africa or India, where they have However, I am dumb, and very open to be convinced.

I have a really good friend who used Starlink for his cottage in Canada and as soon as there was broadband he switched away. Starlink was unreliable and slow compared to what he has now. In my country today the people who use it the most are in northern cities that don't even have roads going to them.

He probably had it pointed at trees. It was super reliable for me when I worked from a rural location in Maine for a couple of months.
Post reply on HN