Live data from Hacker News

Underwater suit-wearing cyborg insect capable of diving and terra-aqua travel

nature.com

61–66 of 66 posts

Re: Underwater suit-wearing cyborg insect capable of diving and terra-aqua travel

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Killing something because it mistakenly wandered into your periphery isn't exactly what I'd call pragmatic. If our solar system drifts too close to another civilization I don't want to get squashed. That's the maxim. We are the fly. If you don't want something bigger than you to be entirely justified in killing you for no reason, you cannot believe yourself to be entirely justified doing the same. The golden rule is…

If you're going to apply the golden rule to amoral objects such as flies, it should also apply to, for instance, bubblegum. You should refrain from chewing bubblegum and blowing bubbles and popping them, because then when a nearby star goes supernova it will spare your life. You are the bubblegum, the star would think, if it had thoughts. Except none of these objects have thoughts, including the fly. You might wonder…

It's a living thing. It can be understood and lived with harmoniously. That's the job of the stronger, smarter thing to identify. If your bar for ethics is sentience, then fuck trees right? Well no, because you would identify trees as beneficial members of nature.

Flies have a role in nature, as decomposers and food/water sources for many other animals. They are a valued participant in Earths ecosystem. Houseflies only exist because we built houses around the decomposing waste that they are biologically wired to seek and consume.

Re: Underwater suit-wearing cyborg insect capable of diving and terra-aqua travel

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're going to apply the golden rule to amoral objects such as flies, it should also apply to, for instance, bubblegum. You should refrain from chewing bubblegum and blowing bubbles and popping them, because then when a nearby star goes supernova it will spare your life. You are the bubblegum, the star would think, if it had thoughts. Except none of these objects have thoughts, including the fly. You might wonder…

It's a living thing. It can be understood and lived with harmoniously. That's the job of the stronger, smarter thing to identify. If your bar for ethics is sentience, then fuck trees right? Well no, because you would identify trees as beneficial members of nature. Flies have a role in nature, as decomposers and food/water sources for many other animals. They are a valued participant in Earths ecosystem. Houseflies on…

So do you live with blood sucking flies in harmony?

Because your role for them is to provide blood.

Re: Underwater suit-wearing cyborg insect capable of diving and terra-aqua travel

#63
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a living thing. It can be understood and lived with harmoniously. That's the job of the stronger, smarter thing to identify. If your bar for ethics is sentience, then fuck trees right? Well no, because you would identify trees as beneficial members of nature. Flies have a role in nature, as decomposers and food/water sources for many other animals. They are a valued participant in Earths ecosystem. Houseflies on…

So do you live with blood sucking flies in harmony? Because your role for them is to provide blood.

[deleted]

Re: Underwater suit-wearing cyborg insect capable of diving and terra-aqua travel

#64
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a living thing. It can be understood and lived with harmoniously. That's the job of the stronger, smarter thing to identify. If your bar for ethics is sentience, then fuck trees right? Well no, because you would identify trees as beneficial members of nature. Flies have a role in nature, as decomposers and food/water sources for many other animals. They are a valued participant in Earths ecosystem. Houseflies on…

So do you live with blood sucking flies in harmony? Because your role for them is to provide blood.

[deleted]

Re: Underwater suit-wearing cyborg insect capable of diving and terra-aqua travel

#65
post #13
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's much easier to plug into something perfected by millions of years of selective pressure.

It really depends on a person's moral qualms and how deeply they are felt. For instance, different people put different amounts of effort in when a rogue house fly enters a room. Some kill, some catch and release. Which is easier? It really depends on the person and what they are willing to tolerate.

My work involves experiments on mammals, so I don't mind.

Re: Underwater suit-wearing cyborg insect capable of diving and terra-aqua travel

#66
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a living thing. It can be understood and lived with harmoniously. That's the job of the stronger, smarter thing to identify. If your bar for ethics is sentience, then fuck trees right? Well no, because you would identify trees as beneficial members of nature. Flies have a role in nature, as decomposers and food/water sources for many other animals. They are a valued participant in Earths ecosystem. Houseflies on…

So do you live with blood sucking flies in harmony? Because your role for them is to provide blood.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN