Earlier quoted context omitted.
You missed the part where Sony is going download only, which means any attempt to collect playstation games in the long run becomes impossible.
So they switch to Steam, a digital-only platform? In what world does that make sense?
45% of enthusiasts 'seriously considering' leaving Sony for PC
71–80 of 139 posts
Re: 45% of enthusiasts 'seriously considering' leaving Sony for PC
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gaming was always an expensive hobby. But this - > Budgets for games are skyrocketing, graphics requirements are skyrocketing Is unrelated. AAA Gaming companies relied so heavily on technical improvements when things were new and genuine leaps in ability that when we hit the graphics are good enough instead of just making great games that are fun, they had to do stupid graphics tricks. Did every strand of hair need t…
> Did that thing that basically no one will ever see need to be created over the course of 9 months? As an engineer, I worry so much about writing perfect code even when I know it is temporary script for one off job. In my home, I painted top of the doors that no one will see. But I know it is painted. It is nice that people care about these small things.
Lots of technically advanced simulations are going on in that game to build the most advanced simulation. But people don't play a game became its simulating a city accurately right down to individual teeth in every citizen. They play a game because it's fun.
Re: 45% of enthusiasts 'seriously considering' leaving Sony for PC
#73For goodness sake, this is literally useless. It tells us nothing.
Even a games website should be embarrassed of it's journalism trying to run this as a story.
Re: 45% of enthusiasts 'seriously considering' leaving Sony for PC
#74Gaming is getting too expensive. This feels like sort of an accident of complex systems. Budgets for games are skyrocketing, graphics requirements are skyrocketing. But, some of the most fun games in the world were made 30 ago. From a pure "can we have good entertainment?" standpoint there's no reason for this cost creep. In practice, companies are pushing it, and although it probably does not apply to the HN crowd,…
Lots of PC games have a $100- $200 tier where you get merch or all the DLC. That's probably aimed at people like me. The point is, if your business is games you make games for the people who will buy them. No game is more fun than a compiler, even the free ones.
Re: 45% of enthusiasts 'seriously considering' leaving Sony for PC
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is keeping an Xbox and its software updated easier than a Steam Machine? Serious question.
I've only ever owned a Steam Deck so can't really comment. I used it a couple times intending to use it when travelling by train then sold it because it was too wide/big to really carry around with the carry case. Didn't really see the advantage over just playing mobile games (or doomscrolling social media etc) or playing more indie/basic games on the laptop. Xbox is fine, it updates itself (firmware/OS updates only…
Re: 45% of enthusiasts 'seriously considering' leaving Sony for PC
#76Re: 45% of enthusiasts 'seriously considering' leaving Sony for PC
#77Only problem with PC gaming is gpu & ram prices.
Re: 45% of enthusiasts 'seriously considering' leaving Sony for PC
#78I think it's driven more about piracy than anything else. Steam is not an alternative if you hate digital only games. PC as a platform (and that can mean anything from Windows to Linux to Mac) is an alternative as cheaper gaming becasue 1, you can pirate games easier 2, you can emulate older games. It really comes down to the next PS6 exclusive, would people buy a console just to play Dark Souls 4? That's the billion…
> Steam is not an alternative if you hate digital only games. GOG is the alternative. It sells DRM-free games
Re: 45% of enthusiasts 'seriously considering' leaving Sony for PC
#79Gaming is getting too expensive. This feels like sort of an accident of complex systems. Budgets for games are skyrocketing, graphics requirements are skyrocketing. But, some of the most fun games in the world were made 30 ago. From a pure "can we have good entertainment?" standpoint there's no reason for this cost creep. In practice, companies are pushing it, and although it probably does not apply to the HN crowd,…
> but consumers are also demanding better graphics. Modern games have visually worse graphics than games that came out 10+ years ago. Beyond that, the success of a lot of games recently with non AAA budgets shows that gamers aren’t demanding anything from the industry beyond playable games that don’t treat them as a perpetual revenue stream.
My knee jerk reaction was to disagree with this, but I thought about it a bit
The Witcher 3 came out 10 years ago. So did Red Dead Redemption 2 (edit: not quite, actually 8 years. Still!)
A lot of games still fall short of those in the graphics department