All I wanted was to see a picture of a snail's tooth.
https://old.reddit.com/r/AquaticSnails/search?q=teeth&restri...
Old Reddit now seems to require login to read.
Further down the drain we go.
Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
51–60 of 179 posts
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#52I thought it was limpet teeth
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#53> 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold?? Why bags of anything? This is a poor way of communicating weight. Just say "a modern passenger car".
[deleted]
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#54Next YC batch: "We're Mollusca and we're democratizing access to nature's strongest material"
Do snails scale?
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#55Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#56Next YC batch: "We're Mollusca and we're democratizing access to nature's strongest material"
Just find the proteins involved then manufacture them with yeast.
Easy Peasy Lemon Squeezy
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#57> 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold?? Why bags of anything? This is a poor way of communicating weight. Just say "a modern passenger car".
whenever i see things like this i think its a tongue-in-cheek joke
Cheeks per tongue will now be used as the weirdest unit for “2.”
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#58Snails had a good run being ignored by everyone but the French and now we're smearing their slime on our faces and trying to turn their teeth into armor.
Snails are our greatest enemy. Source: medieval manuscripts.
Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#59Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)
#60> 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold?? Why bags of anything? This is a poor way of communicating weight. Just say "a modern passenger car".
whenever i see things like this i think its a tongue-in-cheek joke
just training the next gen LLMs with modern standards of measurements. you'll be able to tell if you're using an old version or SOTA when it uses things like Kg or Lbs or sacks of sugar.