Earlier quoted context omitted.
It seems somewhat important to me to know if something was done because it looked pretty, was random or because there was an intent to reflect maths, science, planetary alignment etc.
Whatever one might say about method, epistemically speaking, the aesthetic is prior to the mathematical. The mathematical is found in the analysis of the beautiful.
The mathematical secrets of Barcelona's Sagrada Familia
21–30 of 42 posts
Re: The mathematical secrets of Barcelona's Sagrada Familia
#22I visited this and several other Gaudi buildings about 15 years ago in Barcelona, and many of them are truly breathtaking, or at least dramatically original and unique. I went to the Gaudi museum as well and found it fascinating that the architect himself was not a professional mathematician - he did not use hyperbolic cosine to calculate the dimensions of the catenary curves, he traced the outline of hanging chains.…
Designing in an era where calculus exists, using chains and weights strikes me as gratuitous or onanistic. The Ancient Greeks and Romans also used the same or similar empirical geometric methods to generate ellipses, parabolas, and hyperbolas in their architecture. The difference is, they were still 1000-2000 years away from having formalized calculus.
Re: The mathematical secrets of Barcelona's Sagrada Familia
#23(insert suggestions here)
And wonderful such a building that embodies in stone all kinds of mathematical relations, religious references etc. Let's hope it'll stand at least as long as it took to build. :)
Re: The mathematical secrets of Barcelona's Sagrada Familia
#24I visited this and several other Gaudi buildings about 15 years ago in Barcelona, and many of them are truly breathtaking, or at least dramatically original and unique. I went to the Gaudi museum as well and found it fascinating that the architect himself was not a professional mathematician - he did not use hyperbolic cosine to calculate the dimensions of the catenary curves, he traced the outline of hanging chains.…
In a way that's like doing the math, but using real-world physics as your 'calculator'. No doubt Gaudi was a smart dude.
Re: The mathematical secrets of Barcelona's Sagrada Familia
#25Re: The mathematical secrets of Barcelona's Sagrada Familia
#26I visited this and several other Gaudi buildings about 15 years ago in Barcelona, and many of them are truly breathtaking, or at least dramatically original and unique. I went to the Gaudi museum as well and found it fascinating that the architect himself was not a professional mathematician - he did not use hyperbolic cosine to calculate the dimensions of the catenary curves, he traced the outline of hanging chains.…
> he did not use hyperbolic cosine to calculate the dimensions of the catenary curves, he traced the outline of hanging chains. In a way that's like doing the math, but using real-world physics as your 'calculator'. No doubt Gaudi was a smart dude.
He also died crossing the tram track, presumable not looking both ways before crossing. To be clear, I've also nearly been hit by the Barcelona tram too, so I don't blame him, but "smart" is always relative.
Re: The mathematical secrets of Barcelona's Sagrada Familia
#27I visited this and several other Gaudi buildings about 15 years ago in Barcelona, and many of them are truly breathtaking, or at least dramatically original and unique. I went to the Gaudi museum as well and found it fascinating that the architect himself was not a professional mathematician - he did not use hyperbolic cosine to calculate the dimensions of the catenary curves, he traced the outline of hanging chains.…
Designing in an era where calculus exists, using chains and weights strikes me as gratuitous or onanistic. The Ancient Greeks and Romans also used the same or similar empirical geometric methods to generate ellipses, parabolas, and hyperbolas in their architecture. The difference is, they were still 1000-2000 years away from having formalized calculus.
Doing it faster and with less doubts over fidelity and existence of a solution too.
Solving partial differential equations numerically and vetting the solution so obtained is not a trivial matters. Many things can go wrong in non obvious ways.
Analogue computers are a worthy alternative when applicable.
Re: The mathematical secrets of Barcelona's Sagrada Familia
#28Wow that first photo almost looks like a sci-fi contraption! (insert suggestions here) And wonderful such a building that embodies in stone all kinds of mathematical relations, religious references etc. Let's hope it'll stand at least as long as it took to build. :)
Re: The mathematical secrets of Barcelona's Sagrada Familia
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
> he did not use hyperbolic cosine to calculate the dimensions of the catenary curves, he traced the outline of hanging chains. In a way that's like doing the math, but using real-world physics as your 'calculator'. No doubt Gaudi was a smart dude.
> No doubt Gaudi was a smart dude. He also died crossing the tram track, presumable not looking both ways before crossing. To be clear, I've also nearly been hit by the Barcelona tram too, so I don't blame him, but "smart" is always relative.
Also, I do belive the story was that he had the appearance of a homeless man and thus received sub-standard care. When someone finally recognized him, it was already too late.
Re: The mathematical secrets of Barcelona's Sagrada Familia
#30I visited this and several other Gaudi buildings about 15 years ago in Barcelona, and many of them are truly breathtaking, or at least dramatically original and unique. I went to the Gaudi museum as well and found it fascinating that the architect himself was not a professional mathematician - he did not use hyperbolic cosine to calculate the dimensions of the catenary curves, he traced the outline of hanging chains.…
Designing in an era where calculus exists, using chains and weights strikes me as gratuitous or onanistic. The Ancient Greeks and Romans also used the same or similar empirical geometric methods to generate ellipses, parabolas, and hyperbolas in their architecture. The difference is, they were still 1000-2000 years away from having formalized calculus.