Live data from Hacker News

GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper

toot-books.com

11–20 of 131 posts

Re: GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper

#11
post #2

> nearly as accurate as a human book keeper Anything to avoid using the metric system. Though seriously, what is this metric? Why would I care if an LLM is accurate as a human bookkeeper? Humans aren't exactly known for perfect recall.

It’s a service that provides an AI bookkeeper so it’s a pretty relevant metric.

Re: GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper

#12
post #7
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would I want both a less accurate book keeper and to incur all of the liability of doing the books myself?!

Presumably your current book keeper is not your slave, and you have to pay them...

...again: liability is the key issue. Cost savings a not exactly an isolated issue here.

Re: GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper

#13
I'd be scared shitless to even try something like this. There is just a pretty website, a video, and a blog post. No info on the founders, I can't find anything on LinkedIn, just a company Vineyard Finance LTD that was incorporated last year.

We're all unhinged about the data we're giving LLMs but here I'd draw the line. I'd rather keep paying the small amount I pay to have my accounts done.

Re: GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper

#14

Oh, I'm actively doing this at the moment. FreeAgent grabs my transactions from Wise already, and then I give it [Claude Code, in fact] a folder of PDFs to attach to my invoices, including figuring out VAT, and it's uploading what it found using the FreeAgent API. My accountant hasn't complained yet, and it seems considerably more accurate than when my wife was doing it. Quiet plug for https://github.com/pjlsergeant/…

Very cool!

We've used the following CLI to do the freeagent upload:

https://github.com/anjor/freeagent-cli

How are you dealing with finding the receipts? Would you like to try a receipt finder that grabs them from your mailbox/ google drive?

Re: GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper

#16
post #4
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You'd care if you had a human bookkeeper and you were considering replacing them with this company's AI bookkeeper.

Why would I want both a less accurate book keeper and to incur all of the liability of doing the books myself?!

It's not less accurate. As commented above, the control knew they were being tested against the machine, so made sure to be super careful.

In everyday life the human is less careful, and the machine costs 1% of the human.

Re: GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper

#18

I'd be scared shitless to even try something like this. There is just a pretty website, a video, and a blog post. No info on the founders, I can't find anything on LinkedIn, just a company Vineyard Finance LTD that was incorporated last year. We're all unhinged about the data we're giving LLMs but here I'd draw the line. I'd rather keep paying the small amount I pay to have my accounts done.

Info on the founders coming soon -- we're just going public with this.

For slightly out of date founder bios (both Adam and Iva) were also co-founders here:

https://www.biomage.net/our-team

Re: GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper

#19
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Presumably your current book keeper is not your slave, and you have to pay them...

...again: liability is the key issue. Cost savings a not exactly an isolated issue here.

Then why only have one human bookkeeper? Surely two would be better, since you can compare their results. But then, perhaps you should hire three, so you can figure out which one is right.

Re: GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper

#20

This doesn't surprise me at all. You can really constrain this problem, give very narrow context, and get pretty reliable and reproducible results. I've gotten very good results with some vibe-coded deepseek book keeping. https://github.com/traverseda/beansync Parses emails or other sources, extracts numbers, correlates different transactions, web search, asks questions, stores notes (regex based, very simple). The h…

We've got integrations with major UK banks. Curious if you'd like to use a polished product or be more interested in bank-feed-as-an-API type of use case? What banks do you use?
Post reply on HN