21–30 of 61 posts
For most people, I guess it will say you need to take an English grammer course and draft your own email.
Why would a product talk its users out of using it?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it any good?
No, it’s superficial slop Speaking as a big proponent of Claude code in general, which I find to be revolutionary and useful - there is no value in that report. To be honest, the people who I know who like that report are the ones who are getting sycophantically gaslit by the models more than they should.
:) I went through some Claude documentation that apparently came with my job's paid subscription.
Besides some vague description of how to use the API, it was just fluff. For example there were exactly zero hints on how to do your prompts.
I just feel that any attempt of a service I use to summarize and analyze my interactions with it, whether it's the AI tool usage patterns or the music I listened to the most over the past year, makes me feel creepy and makes me want to use the service less. Imagine if your local grocery store came back to you saying that you ate this many chocolate bars over the year. Thanks, I know that you know that, but I don't wa…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, it’s superficial slop Speaking as a big proponent of Claude code in general, which I find to be revolutionary and useful - there is no value in that report. To be honest, the people who I know who like that report are the ones who are getting sycophantically gaslit by the models more than they should.
> which I find to be revolutionary and useful - there is no value in that report :) I went through some Claude documentation that apparently came with my job's paid subscription. Besides some vague description of how to use the API, it was just fluff. For example there were exactly zero hints on how to do your prompts.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Meh, I have it integrated as a replacement for search engines at this point. I don’t even know that Claude is inherently better or if it’s more the lack of ads.
Search engines without ads exist. Try noai.duckduckgo.com. Decent search results, actual sources, no risk of hallucination, no extreme energy cost.
That's all the integration I need. I don't need OpenClaw running 24x7 trying to hack it's way into my gmail.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it any good?
No, it’s superficial slop Speaking as a big proponent of Claude code in general, which I find to be revolutionary and useful - there is no value in that report. To be honest, the people who I know who like that report are the ones who are getting sycophantically gaslit by the models more than they should.