Very interesting but why would they do this?
PostHog FOSS
11–20 of 68 posts
Re: PostHog FOSS
#12Re: PostHog FOSS
#13Last time I checked, Posthog self hosted was basically unusable. They have a hobby deployment script which just pulls the latest build from master which varies from “somewhat works” to “completely broken”
Re: PostHog FOSS
#14Last time I checked, Posthog self hosted was basically unusable. They have a hobby deployment script which just pulls the latest build from master which varies from “somewhat works” to “completely broken”
It's still great to make the code open, but it's not usable anymore for a self-hosted setup.
Re: PostHog FOSS
#15Re: PostHog FOSS
#16I remember applying sometime ago, not really knowing what they did. They then spammed me with marketing mail, now they're open-sourced and had received a (supposedly marketing) job posting?
Granted in this entire history I had no idea what their product was. Seems flakey, but I haven't used it.
Re: PostHog FOSS
#17Re: PostHog FOSS
#18I feel I'm missing some basics as to what this can do for me or what problem it solves.
edit so it's like google analytics .
Re: PostHog FOSS
#19Source: I was there
To clarify: PostHog has been MIT licensed since day 1, with the exception of the `ee/` folder. This `posthog-foss` repo is a mirror of the main `posthog` repo with the `ee/` folder removed. We've had it for ages.
Re: PostHog FOSS
#20But now AI screwed them over so they come with their own open-source spaghetti.