Live data from Hacker News

Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

arstechnica.com

121–130 of 168 posts

Re: Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I get that doom sense, but... I can't really see it happening because... well, people that have never truly been hungry are already frantically clacking at their keyboards with the slogan of "eat the rich!" I don't know what we get? But if this is the rhetoric now, how many Luigis would we expect to see as things got really bad, and the vision you paint is really bad.

The thing with AI and AI-enabled automation is that it may lead to a world where the rich don't need anyone else anymore. I could totally imagine things shaking out where the rich and everything important is so-well defended that even an army of Luigis is impotent. Also, after a couple assassinations of business leaders I think we'll see gun control laws like the US has never seen.

I doubt that would matter.

There are so many firearms in America even if there was bipartisan support for a gun ban it wouldn’t happen. You literally couldn’t get rid of them if you tried.

Re: Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

#122

This is already a clusterfuck, but it's going to be so much worse in 10 years. We're going to have an entire generation trapped in the gig economy because their education is going to be considered worthless, and even if it wasn't worthless, there won't be enough entry level jobs for anyone to get into. Senior people will age out and our entire society is just going to be hollowed out. And people wonder why I'm an AI…

> there won't be enough entry level jobs for anyone to get into.

You know, I was reading an article about falling labor force participation rates, and one thing was pointed out was there seems to be a supply mismatch. Plenty of jobs are available, they’re just shit, go nowhere, pay nothing in the facing of rapidly rising COL jobs.

I suspect the only retirement I’ll ever see will have to be via a shotgun.

Re: Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

replying to my own thread here, but this got me thinking, so thanks OP, but... can anyone here think of some better ways where we could decouple the education process from the work process? To me this seems like the main problem. It seems that we've decided that "get good grades == good employee" collectively. I know I'm a bad employee (which is why I work for myself now but that's another story), but I got great gra…

Make education free. I'd love to study something like philosophy or art history but there's just no return on that investment. Unless you're already wealthy, it doesn't make sense to drop five or six figures on a degree unless it's likely to pay for itself. Which is even becoming less likely with STEM, as we hit a confluence of higher education costs, fewer job openings, and AI as a competitor for work.

[deleted]

Re: Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

#124
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a non-Australian I just have to know what “chippies” and “sparkies” are!

Chippy = carpenter (from wood chips) Sparky = electrician

If you see chips where a chippy is working, that's fine.

If you see sparks where a sparky is working, get a different sparky. :)

Re: Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

#125
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Another thing we can add is sealing grades. If you can’t use your grades as a credential, the incentive to cheat is reduced. This won’t solve the relation between getting a job and living - that’s a job for UBI and a comprehensive social security system.

Or, maybe we get rid of them. Like maybe the idea of having grades is kind of silly in the first place?

Free education and no grades with no business purpose already exists; it's called learning about things that interest you on your own time. I don't see why the taxpayer needs to pay for someone to do this.

Re: Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

#126
post #84

Disallowing the use of AI is basically the modern equivalent of testing based on memorization. It is a laziness to find something more useful to evaluate on or an inability to distinguish real understanding in a field from first level understanding. Professors need to step up and teach value beyond what LLMs know (very possible with or without LLMS). Or get out of the way from those building on the field with LLMs. I…

The article clearly lays out that the take-home test was not a test of memorization, but a test of students' understanding of the class material and ability to reason about how different assumptions affect its conclusions.

Re: Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

#127
post #19
post #16

Seems like an application of Goodhart's law; measuring worth by degree or grades stopped measuring learning or ability. This was a lot harder to cheat before AI, but now the floodgates are open and grades and degrees earned post-AI are showing that they mean little. Cheating on college tests should be a jailable criminal offense (similar to computer fraud) so that there is dignity in the degree again. Considering the…

You don’t even need to go that far. If they just expelled cheaters instead of trying to sweep it under the rug and ignore it that would go a long way.

> If they just expelled cheaters instead of trying to sweep it under the rug and ignore it that would go a long way.

You can’t treat paying customers like that. They’ll just go somewhere that will let them cheat!

Re: Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

#128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But education is almost worthless now already. Nowadays pretty much everyone has a degree and then couldn't find a job and lucking real skills and experience. Ai is not a cause, it will simply speed up the degradation of the system.

> Nowadays pretty much everyone has a degree and then couldn't find a job The unemployment rate in the US is 3.7%. 38% of adults in the US have a college degree. 38% is hardly everyone, and if nobody can find a job, then the unemployment rate should be far higher than 3.7%, which is basically full employment.

How about the relevant age group? Like 25-35 y.o.

For sure 20-y.o. adults have no degree and students are not count as unemployed.

Re: Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

#129
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

citation needed on that last claim. do you have universal healthcare free at point of service? do you have a healthy supply of public housing? do you let children starve, through no fault of their own but the circumstances of their birth? do you engage is ears of choice and murder 100+ innocent children in a primary school on the first day of the conflict? the answer to some of these questions should be yes, and othe…

The greatest country on earth ever is that which most people of the world, if given a free plane ticket and permission to live in, would go to. I don’t know how you find it controversial. It’s just a fact.

Maybe just the best marketed?

Re: Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered in-person final; scores fell 50%

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or, maybe we get rid of them. Like maybe the idea of having grades is kind of silly in the first place?

Free education and no grades with no business purpose already exists; it's called learning about things that interest you on your own time. I don't see why the taxpayer needs to pay for someone to do this.

Then you're missing the point of higher education.
Post reply on HN