We've been self-hosting GitLab for about a year now, and I don't remember it ever going down or being unavailable. We self-host almost everything else too (except for online meetings), and it's all been pretty stable as well. Some of the tools we self-host do go down occasionally, but it's usually just a matter of restarting the VM or adding more storage.
Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
91–100 of 289 posts
Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
#92Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
#93Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
#94Why don't open source alternatives just copy the UI to make it easier to switch? Everyone knows the GitHub UI and it's intuitive. I'm happy to get more privacy and freedom, you don't have to make a worse design just to be different. Fluxer figured this out and they're the best discord replacement imo. https://fluxer.app/
Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
#95You'd be surprised how easy it is to self-host GitLab with Docker Compose, GitLab has an official "Omnibus" Docker image. No need to handicap yourself with Gitea/Forgejo/whatever, you can just use an industry-standard platform without much effort. Hardware requirements are nowhere close to high either.
What makes GitLab "industry-standard" and Forgejo not?
Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
You use github as a backup, why bother self-hosting then?
Not GP. Probably less dependencies on github, e.g. actions which sometimes don't work. This way github is a "dumb backup". I selfhost forgejo (gitea fork) on home sever (nuc), similar setup with tailscale. I was planning to setup git mirror on a remote VM for backup, but since I am the only one using it and have everything on dev laptop and remote backups of nuc server I didn't bother to do that (I know I still shoul…
Eh? What GH department do you work in anyways? Training Data Sustainability?
Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
#97Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have been self-hosting GitLab for my org a few years by now, with quite a few users (>800 atm). Updates are automatic via the GitLab Omnibus package repos. Once or twice per year some update requires intervention. Otherwise, nothing bad happens. Very happy so far. Biggest problem at the moment is that AI scrapers (curse them and their owners, pox be upon their houses!) sometimes bring things to a crawl. But nothing t…
If you are running an org you should be putting all your private services behind netbird or tailscale at minimum. Zero public infra exposure beyond them.
Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
#99Sentiment for/against GitHub aside... "Why X are doing Y" articles like these pretend that the premise of "X are doing Y" is true, conveniently skipping to the "Why" before proving that the premise is even accurate in any meaningful way. This is why I never buy headlines that start out with "Why". > developers are ditching Proceeds to list but a handful of remotely meaningful repos against the hundreds of thousands o…
Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except the article doesn't prove any trend
The existence and growth of the codeberg project does, however.
And Telegram is a lot more developed and has a much larger percentage of the global instant messenger marketshare, compared to Github vs CodeBerg.