21–26 of 26 posts
Fascinatingly, the original 'mistake' post reads as very AI-generated, and this apology is significantly more human-sounding. Possibly indicative of the lack-of-care that caused the original issue.
The apology reads extremely corporate-generic to me. Nothing of value was said in it.
Fascinatingly, the original 'mistake' post reads as very AI-generated, and this apology is significantly more human-sounding. Possibly indicative of the lack-of-care that caused the original issue.
The apology reads extremely corporate-generic to me. Nothing of value was said in it.
When you have a headline that does not say what the actual topic is, and you are forced to click the article to find out the topic, that is called "clickbait".
I don't think it's clickbait, but it's still a poor article to link. It's a mea culpa about some kind of controversy, but that controversy isn't described in detail and you're assumed to already know what's going on.
It sounds like some TOS change about a "data enrichment" feature, but I have no idea what the issue was with that? Maybe training on that data or having data leak across customers?
Wir hätten klarer kommunizieren müssen, was wir vorschlugen und wie es funktionieren würde.虽然我们 always intended for enrichment to remain strictly opt-in, we should have communicated better how that opt-in works, and importantly, how you as a customer could ensure you remain in control of that choice.
why does your comment start in German, then go to Chinese and then Enlgish lol?