Live data from Hacker News

We made Grok 4.5, GPT-5.5, and Claude build the same apps

tryai.dev

21–30 of 97 posts

Re: We made Grok 4.5, GPT-5.5, and Claude build the same apps

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The honest takeaway: this is 100% written by an LLM.

That was the honest giveaway ... :-D

I did a quick skim and the usage of phrases like "snappy stylist" and "speed-and-value monster" were what instantly stuck out to me as AI. I decided I probably didn't need to actually read the article after that.

Re: We made Grok 4.5, GPT-5.5, and Claude build the same apps

#27
post #20

I'd like to see the comparisons with DeepSeek, Qwen, Mimo, Kimi and GLM

I just did the tests, Mimo and GLM delivered working cubes but GLM was the only visually perfect with smooth movements and great effects.

GLM is the clear winner:

https://chat.z.ai/space/t19sx5kvw631-art

Re: We made Grok 4.5, GPT-5.5, and Claude build the same apps

#29
post #2

Tried at work , this release def a moment I will remember. My work is not the same . The model is the first model that offer exactly as I want : For hard tasks , that needs precision I will wait and pay expensive tokens For everything else , query data , logs, rolling out releases , I’m using grok and it’s much better vs other tools and much cheaper too .

Who the hell tries something that's been out a few hours and says "My work is not the same"?

Re: We made Grok 4.5, GPT-5.5, and Claude build the same apps

#30

[flagged]

It’s still science if you say “this appears to be a specimen of X” even if you don’t do a genetic test. Things don’t automatically graduate to science either by repetition or by formal verification. What makes a rubics cube is obvious enough that you can pass or fail.
Post reply on HN