Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh the Karens these days!
Surely such a person would use the spelling k@r3n
Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
191–200 of 253 posts
Re: Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
#192Re: Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
#193Re: Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
#194"Uniqlo x Akamai sells another design of shirt in the same range which is plainly incomplete" Imagine having to return a t-shirt because that malfunction! — I don't understand why are you returning this, was the size wrong or you didn't like it? — No, there is a syntax error at line 37 that makes it impossible to run, and I'm concerned people on the street may think I promote unsafe bash scripting.
Re: Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
#195"Uniqlo x Akamai sells another design of shirt in the same range which is plainly incomplete" Imagine having to return a t-shirt because that malfunction! — I don't understand why are you returning this, was the size wrong or you didn't like it? — No, there is a syntax error at line 37 that makes it impossible to run, and I'm concerned people on the street may think I promote unsafe bash scripting.
Re: Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
#196I love this shirt! Here's a nice video from the actual designer about the process of making this shirt (including intentionally making it hard to OCR): https://youtu.be/jocGLiecpjU?t=526
It would probably be quicker to type it in than figure out how to OCR it. It would be like typing in a game from a COMPUTE! magazine 45 years go. https://archive.org/details/1983-01-compute-magazine/page/96...
Re: Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
#197"Uniqlo x Akamai sells another design of shirt in the same range which is plainly incomplete" Imagine having to return a t-shirt because that malfunction! — I don't understand why are you returning this, was the size wrong or you didn't like it? — No, there is a syntax error at line 37 that makes it impossible to run, and I'm concerned people on the street may think I promote unsafe bash scripting.
ATTN, Uniqlo customer service employees: If someone tries to return a shirt claiming an error in the printed computer code, decline the request and reply, "A real script kiddie would've spotted that error before buying."
Re: Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
#198I thought it was funny that the author used a variety of OCR tools with mixed success before spending a lot of time manually fixing up the output from the best one, rather than just typing it in
"just typing it" would be more error prone for the average human
Re: Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
#199I don't know... I prefer unobfuscated text that you can immediately grok. The other day I saw this on a T-shirt: > May the m×s/t² be with you
Re: Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
> All the smells you pointed out, just look like a Python dev approaching bash without fully understanding it. also, referring to Linux as "the language of the internet" when bash isn't particularly suited for internet tasks also smell like "excited windows Python dev"...
FWIW, his screens looked a lot like OSX to me (which tracks with graphic design users in my experience). Anyway, he seems like a very nice fellow and I wish him and almost all T-shirt designers well. That bash script just gave me a lot of pause. (And even that seems possibly downstream of him being nice and doing it himself to spare his team from what he called a "FrankenProject".)