Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this open source? I can't find a link to download the weights.
It's based on an open weight model (Kimi 2.7) so shouldn't it also be open weight?
SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence
31–40 of 151 posts
Re: SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence
#32A company whose first demo was completely fraudulent announces that its model beats GPT-5.5, on its own benchmark? I’m gonna wait a little before I trust this. This whole company seems to optimize for raising money and impressing VCs. Lying about their products, ignoring consumer market to target enterprise, bragging about how they work their employees like slaves, and writing these posts full of intimidating technic…
Re: SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
all the open source models are a waste of time relative to the bleeding edge from openai/anthropic
At work I wouldn't want to use anything else. Compared to my salary a Claude subscription (or two) is cheap For hobby projects I've completely switched to DeepSeek v4 pro. I spend less than on a $10 Claude plan and am not subjected to quota limits (when I have time and motivation, the last thing I want is a 5 hour quota running out). And the difference in model performance is fine for those smaller projects, most of…
Re: SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence
#34Re: SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence
#35Open source for the win! Imagine how far community might have pushed if 2 past versions of 'morally superior' Anthropic and 'completely Open AI' open sourced their models for the community to build on top of them
Re: SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence
#36These models are never as good, the benchmarks dont tell the full story
Re: SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence
#37These models are never as good, the benchmarks dont tell the full story
Re: SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
all the open source models are a waste of time relative to the bleeding edge from openai/anthropic
Not true since a few months, genuinely try GLM 5.2 and Minimax M3, especially in adversarial/gating... as a general model, I can agree, but as a coding model, they are not bad, comparable to maybe Opus 4.5 in real usage which is quite impressive.
Re: SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence
#39Not finding anything about this while searching huggingface: https://huggingface.co/search/full-text?q=SWE-1.7 i assume this is another closed source model?
Re: SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence
#40We need more models that optimize for coding and that can be cheaper than frontier models, like what SWE 1.7 and composer 2.5 are trying to do. I don't think there's an effort to make something GLM-5.2 level but focused only on coding.
Qwen was doing something like this with their coder models. But alas, they seem not to be releasing those anymore. Last one was Qwen3-coder-next.