For coding Opus 4.8 with ultracode is near perfect and doesn't grind away as many tokens. Fable is advertised as 2x the tokens but in my experience it is closer to 5x what I burn with Opus 4.8.
Do you mean in tokens or in $?
We're extending access to Fable 5 on all paid plans through July 12
21–30 of 269 posts
Re: We're extending access to Fable 5 on all paid plans through July 12
#22Very expensive, not sure how it fits in with many companies seemingly trying to get employees using models at about Sonnet tier pricing. I certainly would never pay API rates for it, using ccusage I am seeing myself "use" $150-$400 worth of fable per day. ( https://www.theinformation.com/articles/tesla-caps-employee-... )
That's funny. Sonnet is not great in my opinion. I mean, it often amazes me with its creativity, and I do prefer its style over most bigger models from other providers. But it also constantly just does dumb things that make me slap my forehead. Opus is a lot better but the slap ratio has not reached 0 yet. Fable seems a bit better there, more testing needed. But yeah, VC money ran out, now we wait for Moore's Law...…
I use GLM 5.2 through Opencode Go, but find it to be quite slow when you get to higher contexts (80k+) through their provider so I have not been able to test too much.
Re: We're extending access to Fable 5 on all paid plans through July 12
#23I have a really hard time understanding how anyone is ready to pay $200/mo to be put on such a rollercoaster all the time . I've used fable, it's great. But nothing beats predictability - ever. This truly feels like some form of emotional abuse/manipulation at this point.
I pay that much and don't even use Fable because everything I do involves biology
Re: We're extending access to Fable 5 on all paid plans through July 12
#24...because there's not enough token addicts and we need a proper set of whales.
Re: We're extending access to Fable 5 on all paid plans through July 12
#25...because there's not enough token addicts and we need a proper set of whales.
[dead]
Re: We're extending access to Fable 5 on all paid plans through July 12
#26Hmm, so I planned to use all my allowance in 6 hours time (the time they said it would be around until) for the week and then they extend it so that I burned almost all of them in a wasteful way without having the time to review things properly.
Re: We're extending access to Fable 5 on all paid plans through July 12
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's funny. Sonnet is not great in my opinion. I mean, it often amazes me with its creativity, and I do prefer its style over most bigger models from other providers. But it also constantly just does dumb things that make me slap my forehead. Opus is a lot better but the slap ratio has not reached 0 yet. Fable seems a bit better there, more testing needed. But yeah, VC money ran out, now we wait for Moore's Law...…
I use GLM 5.2 through Opencode Go, but find it to be quite slow when you get to higher contexts (80k+) through their provider so I have not been able to test too much.
Do they disclose their providers? I haven't found any info.
Re: We're extending access to Fable 5 on all paid plans through July 12
#28I believe these labs really nailed the restrictions on independence for these models. I have seen collegues coding bs with fable 5. Genuinely, the skill issues is feel by the agent and the output is alike
Re: We're extending access to Fable 5 on all paid plans through July 12
#29[dead]