31–40 of 61 posts
I upgraded my website recently and it's exciting! That being said, I admit my builds didn't get faster (they actually on average slowed down a bit). Hopefully that improves, but worth noting.
We're working on incremental builds which should help as well: https://github.com/withastro/roadmap/issues/1388
I really really like Astro, but I'm either getting old or it's something else. I just recently updated my website to Astro 6 and now... there's Astro 7. Maybe by the time I update, Astro 8 will be a few weeks in the future.
I made the Rust compiler and the Rust Markdown pipeline ( https://satteri.bruits.org ) in this, let me know if you have any questions, glad to answer anything!
Are these typical build speeds on static sites these days? It's slower than I expected for a rust re-write. (Or I guess maybe the portion re-written in rust is only a small part of the build pipeline time?) My understanding is that astro isn't considered particularly slow?
I made the Rust compiler and the Rust Markdown pipeline ( https://satteri.bruits.org ) in this, let me know if you have any questions, glad to answer anything!
If yes, then this instability is a serious concern to me.
"Astro supports every major UI framework. Bring your existing components and take advantage of Astro's optimized client build performance."
But isn't Astro a framework itself? And then apparently you need Node as well. The frameworks upon frameworks in Web development are baffling.
I don't understand what this is, based on this statement: "Astro supports every major UI framework. Bring your existing components and take advantage of Astro's optimized client build performance." But isn't Astro a framework itself? And then apparently you need Node as well. The frameworks upon frameworks in Web development are baffling.