Fable turned reMarkable into Tom Riddle's diary from Harry Potter

Post by butlike » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 6:58 PM UTC

SXX wrote: post #134

sillysaurusx wrote: post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is in fact what happened to me, except I think the final decision was made by a human since the ban came later. I didn’t issue any queries in between, so I know it was my convo about barbiturates.

It has nothing to do with human decisions. Bans always come later because it's a best way to make sure most people who get banned would never know what are they banned for exactly and what threshold there is, The same tactics used in game development against cheaters. If it would ban you right after prompt you'll know how to avoid getting banned. Obviously that didn't worked for you because you wasn't doing multiple…

Post by butlike » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:03 PM UTC

Cthulhu_ wrote: post #253

sillysaurusx wrote: post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every AI would refuse the prompt. I was banned for researching Nordic assisted death and asking which drug exactly they administered (and what quantity). Claude refused, alerted Anthropic, and I was banned a couple days later. Thankfully the appeal form worked, but by then I was using a different Claude account praying they didn’t ban me again. There’s an uncensored model floating around that you can run locally with…

I'm actually weirdly glad that they take this draconic step and basically say "this knowledge is forbidden", because it means that people can't solely rely on LLMs for research. They shouldn't to begin with (just like back then with Wikipedia), but it's almost too convenient. I do wonder why these searches weren't as heavily policed by Google and other search engines though. They probably show a suicide prevention ho…

Post by [deleted] » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:12 PM UTC

coryrc wrote: post #397

flextheruler wrote: post #287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So like a bottle of cough syrup it should have a child-lock cap and be required to be 18 and show I.D. to buy?

First, cough syrup ID checking is not about deaths, as nearly none are associated with dextromethorphan abuse (17 from 2000-2010, and most not from OTC). But an estimated 980 deaths/year from acetaminophen abuse: https://www.propublica.org/article/tylenol-mcneil-fda-behind... So that's a great example: harm adults because young people have access to something which is hardly dangerous, but set them free with multi-to…

Post by butlike » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:27 PM UTC

snerbles wrote: post #170

rob74 wrote: post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wasn't that Kool-Aid? (yeah, I know that's not sold in cans, and actually it was Flavor-Aid: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid#Backgrou... )

Different meme, about adtech-driven dystopia. See original greentext [0] [0] https://files.catbox.moe/eqg0b2.png

Post by fc417fc802 » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:38 PM UTC

coryrc wrote: post #244

JumpCrisscross wrote: post #218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Cars are literally the number one killer of children 0-14 in the United States. More than cancer, more than guns, more than the next 7 reasons combined Cars are heavily regulated. Require licenses to use. Entail massive losses of freedoms when used, e.g. you can be randomly breathalyzed or whatnot. Cars are dangerous. Comparing anything to a car (or, per Altman and now Dario, to a nuke) means it should be tightly r…

Essentially no one in the USA fails to get a license if they try for one. There's no ongoing competence testing. Washington State recently failed to advance legislation to make the fourth DUI have a jail sentence because it would be too expensive imprisoning that many people . > Cars are dangerous. You can kill yourself with a kitchen knife in your own kitchen. Should be "heavily regulate" that too? How about we have…