Astro 7.0

#1

Post by saikatsg » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 6:30 PM UTC

Astro 7.0
astro.build

Re: Astro 7.0

#2

Post by keepupnow » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 6:51 PM UTC

"The .astro compiler has been rewritten in Rust.".

I'm personally awaiting the rewrite to assembly.

Re: Astro 7.0

#3

Post by Princesseuh » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:03 PM UTC

I made the Rust compiler and the Rust Markdown pipeline (https://satteri.bruits.org) in this, let me know if you have any questions, glad to answer anything!

Re: Astro 7.0

#4

Post by toddmorey » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:05 PM UTC

Princesseuh wrote: post #3

I made the Rust compiler and the Rust Markdown pipeline ( https://satteri.bruits.org ) in this, let me know if you have any questions, glad to answer anything!

Thanks for your work on this!

Re: Astro 7.0

#5

Post by keepupnow » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:08 PM UTC

Princesseuh wrote: post #3

I made the Rust compiler and the Rust Markdown pipeline ( https://satteri.bruits.org ) in this, let me know if you have any questions, glad to answer anything!

For the good of humanity, I must ask... How much Claude? How much human?

Re: Astro 7.0

#6

Post by microflash » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:09 PM UTC

The switch to strict HTML compilation is just not cool, and actively prevents upgrading sites which need to deal with remote content that is not written in strict HTML.

I also wish there could be a general purpose content processing API so I can plug a different format than markdown (such as typst)

Re: Astro 7.0

#7

Post by ZeWaka » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:10 PM UTC

Princesseuh wrote: post #3

I made the Rust compiler and the Rust Markdown pipeline ( https://satteri.bruits.org ) in this, let me know if you have any questions, glad to answer anything!

How does Satteri compare to a standard library like marked (https://github.com/markedjs/marked)?

Re: Astro 7.0

#8

Post by BorisMelnik » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:12 PM UTC

microflash wrote: post #6

The switch to strict HTML compilation is just not cool, and actively prevents upgrading sites which need to deal with remote content that is not written in strict HTML. I also wish there could be a general purpose content processing API so I can plug a different format than markdown (such as typst)

this terrified me lol I'm on 5.1.x on most of my sites

Re: Astro 7.0

#9

Post by BorisMelnik » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:13 PM UTC

Princesseuh wrote: post #3

I made the Rust compiler and the Rust Markdown pipeline ( https://satteri.bruits.org ) in this, let me know if you have any questions, glad to answer anything!

great job, that is a huge accomplishment.

Re: Astro 7.0

#10

Post by Princesseuh » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 7:16 PM UTC

microflash wrote: post #6

The switch to strict HTML compilation is just not cool, and actively prevents upgrading sites which need to deal with remote content that is not written in strict HTML. I also wish there could be a general purpose content processing API so I can plug a different format than markdown (such as typst)

This does not affect remote content, only the content written in .astro files. If you have remote content you'd use something like `set:html`: https://docs.astro.build/en/reference/directives-reference/#...

See this example: https://stackblitz.com/edit/github-ug3paw61?file=src%2Fpages...