Fable turned reMarkable into Tom Riddle's diary from Harry Potter

Post by rerdavies » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 5:08 AM UTC

sillysaurusx wrote: post #74

rerdavies wrote: post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Harry Potter would have posted the original video to YouTube instead. It seems like a tragic irony, and perhaps a sign of danger, that OP posted the demo video to the website of He Who Should Not Be Named. Why? Why?!

Because Twitter posts consisting of YouTube links die quickly. It’s very obvious once you have a few thousand followers. Your option is basically either upload to twitter, or put the YouTube link at the end just before a screenshot. Or both a video and a YouTube link, I suppose. If you trigger their YouTube embed, it seems like it gets penalized quite harshly. I’ve seen other people agree with the sentiment.

Post by charcircuit » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC

SXX wrote: post #134

sillysaurusx wrote: post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is in fact what happened to me, except I think the final decision was made by a human since the ban came later. I didn’t issue any queries in between, so I know it was my convo about barbiturates.

It has nothing to do with human decisions. Bans always come later because it's a best way to make sure most people who get banned would never know what are they banned for exactly and what threshold there is, The same tactics used in game development against cheaters. If it would ban you right after prompt you'll know how to avoid getting banned. Obviously that didn't worked for you because you wasn't doing multiple…

Post by melagonster » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 5:17 AM UTC

avaer wrote: post #15

Tcepsa wrote: post #9

I understand that this is kind of beside the point, but it seems like a bad thing to compare inventions to haunted artifacts that mind controlled their users into betraying their friends to a powerfully evil being. (Though since it is being powered by GenAI, which has also driven people to do bad things, perhaps it is an apt comparison.)

Why would that comparison be bad if it's accurate? Also, "sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Both can be made good and evil.

Post by amarant » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 5:20 AM UTC

someguyiguess wrote: post #80

stronglikedan wrote: post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

must be your browser or something, or maybe regional. they play right away for me on Windows Chrome as a rando

Nope. Thats just you. The rest of us have lots of issues.

Post by [deleted] » Tue, Jul 07, 2026, 5:29 AM UTC

sillysaurusx wrote: post #81

JumpCrisscross wrote: post #70

Ironically, Tom Riddle's diary encouraging kids to commit suicide [1] and then showing them how to do it would be more on brand than the version in the books. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_linked_to_chatbots#Suic...

Every AI would refuse the prompt. I was banned for researching Nordic assisted death and asking which drug exactly they administered (and what quantity). Claude refused, alerted Anthropic, and I was banned a couple days later. Thankfully the appeal form worked, but by then I was using a different Claude account praying they didn’t ban me again. There’s an uncensored model floating around that you can run locally with…