Live data from Hacker News

The Music of Destruction

thebaffler.com

1–10 of 16 posts

Re: The Music of Destruction

#5

[flagged]

What's the difference? They were involved in what is colloquially known as WWII. They just refer to their specific part differently amongst themselves, but they certainly did have WWII.

I believe the offense is that here, on an English language website with a mostly American and Western European audience, the term used was insufficiently deferential to how Russians would refer to it in Russian.

Re: The Music of Destruction

#7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the difference? They were involved in what is colloquially known as WWII. They just refer to their specific part differently amongst themselves, but they certainly did have WWII.

I believe the offense is that here, on an English language website with a mostly American and Western European audience, the term used was insufficiently deferential to how Russians would refer to it in Russian.

We should deferentially deny that the Soviet Union invaded Poland and Finland? I will try this when people mention Vietnam, Iraq etc.

Re: The Music of Destruction

#8
post #4

[flagged]

It's called a world war in english because everyone and everywhere was at war during that time. Pretty much every group has a name for it in their own language.

> because everyone and everywhere was at war during that time.

No, that is incorrect

Re: The Music of Destruction

#9

[flagged]

We used both terms, the WW term meant the overall event and the other one was for the Soviet part that started June 22, 1941 and ended in 1945, first in Germany, the main victory, the in Far East in the war with Japan. The term itself is taken from to the war of 1812 with Napoleon; that one was The Patriotic War. The Finnish war has its own name. The Poland operation is not counted as a part of the war.
Post reply on HN