Live data from Hacker News

Anthropic's Method to Losing Goodwill in a Few Easy Steps

raheeljunaid.com

1–10 of 206 posts

Re: Anthropic's Method to Losing Goodwill in a Few Easy Steps

#2
Not sure why this was flagged, Anthropic has obviously been burning bridges. I thought this line was funny though:

> If you want to autocomplete, like I do, you don’t need Fable, or even Opus; Sonnet works fine.

It reads like "if you want to go to the grocery store, you don't need a space shuttle, or even a SR-71 Blackbird; a Cessna works fine."

Re: Anthropic's Method to Losing Goodwill in a Few Easy Steps

#4
post #2

Not sure why this was flagged, Anthropic has obviously been burning bridges. I thought this line was funny though: > If you want to autocomplete, like I do, you don’t need Fable, or even Opus; Sonnet works fine. It reads like "if you want to go to the grocery store, you don't need a space shuttle, or even a SR-71 Blackbird; a Cessna works fine."

I agree that without context, Sonnet is overkill for just autocomplete code suggestions. My point later in that section is that to have an autocomplete mindset (where an AI is a helpful tool rather than a driver), you only need a decent subset of models, not the best of the best.

Re: Anthropic's Method to Losing Goodwill in a Few Easy Steps

#5
post #2

Not sure why this was flagged, Anthropic has obviously been burning bridges. I thought this line was funny though: > If you want to autocomplete, like I do, you don’t need Fable, or even Opus; Sonnet works fine. It reads like "if you want to go to the grocery store, you don't need a space shuttle, or even a SR-71 Blackbird; a Cessna works fine."

Sounds like the author is using "autocomplete" as a derogatory way of referring to LLMs in general (eg. "LLMs can't code, they're just autocomplete on steroids")

Re: Anthropic's Method to Losing Goodwill in a Few Easy Steps

#6
Think I'm about to switch. I can't build the automations i'm trying to with claude code anymore. Since they locked away the non-interactive usage and channels can't be used without interacting with the console on startup. I had a good web interface for running CC in containers in k8s but I think it's time to bail out and build around a codex subscription and pi.dev now. I have local models hooked up to pi dev and that's working well. Had it build itself Channels equivalent so agents can talk to each other and receive webhooks. I bet Anthropic will build these things into their ecosystem eventually, but I want it now and running on my cloud.

Edit: I forgot they also don't let me use remote control (which isn't that good anyway) with a oauth key in the env var! So i have to get on a terminal and do the whole login flow for my containerized agents. Massive pain, so lame.

Re: Anthropic's Method to Losing Goodwill in a Few Easy Steps

#7
It worth noting that – just to add to the confusion – they apparently cancelled the June 15th change just before it was due to go live:

https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-clau...

https://the-decoder.com/anthropic-backs-off-unpopular-billin...

So... maybe we can still use third party harnesses with Claude Code subscriptions... for now? Until they change their mind again?

Re: Anthropic's Method to Losing Goodwill in a Few Easy Steps

#8
It's looking like Anthropic is realizing that they're about to get squeezed so they need to juice revenue for their IPO before it becomes obvious to everyone else.

Open models like GLM 5.2 are getting good enough to handle 90% of tasks, and will eat most of their usage unless they start serving it at cost. And on the 1% work they fearmongered their way into falling under government control, which will limit how much they can commercialize the frontier.

Nobody will keep paying their premiums and put up with their BS when they can have similar models at cost of inference in any harness that they want.

Re: Anthropic's Method to Losing Goodwill in a Few Easy Steps

#9
Anthropic takes every chance they make not only to behave suspicious and anti-consumer but also announce that they are acting in ways that hurt you while telling you it’s a feature.

Fable returning wrong answers if it suspects the topic is sensative is the ultimate icing on the huge cake of lies and gaslighting they’ve been baking the past 6 months.

Post reply on HN