Live data from Hacker News

Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills

readtheline.ca

31–40 of 91 posts

Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills

#31
post #21

I don’t know the specifics of this case, but in Canada, calls like this (all wrapped up in the flag), usually come from Canadian companies hoping for some sort of sole sourced contract that they have no business getting. So so perhaps we should be excluding American companies at this time, but in the name of competition and openness, we should allow bids from our real allies, such as the Europeans or the Asians.

Excluding China, I hope.

Why?

Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills

#32
post #18
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Palantir's software stack is not really that complex, and their FDE workforce is famously... undereducated. Canada should be able to pull it off, there's much to improve on.

If that's true then why hasn't Canada managed to produce a credible competitor already? What are they missing? Will the opportunity to win domestic government contracts change that situation or are there other obstacles?

Because govtech is notoriously difficult to break in to.

Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills

#33
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Palantir is elbow-deep in the Trump administration, the same one that has repeatedly threatened to annex Canada. That is not a threat to be taken lightly, and the Canadian public agrees Are they making any preparations for war, at all, that they weren't also doing in 2021?

[flagged]

Assuming the answer is "no", that is sufficient to demonstrate that the Canadian public sees the threat as one to be taken lightly, and indeed one to which the most appropriate reaction is to ignore it.

Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills

#34
post #18
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Palantir's software stack is not really that complex, and their FDE workforce is famously... undereducated. Canada should be able to pull it off, there's much to improve on.

If that's true then why hasn't Canada managed to produce a credible competitor already? What are they missing? Will the opportunity to win domestic government contracts change that situation or are there other obstacles?

we are talking about LLM+hardware.

You as canada have only two options:

1) use closed sourced systems

2) use chinese models, with their own risks

3) hardware, i think it's clear.

Cohere is not even in the list of top competitors .

Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills

#35
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If that's true then why hasn't Canada managed to produce a credible competitor already? What are they missing? Will the opportunity to win domestic government contracts change that situation or are there other obstacles?

Canada do have an ai company Cohere that has potential to be big. Personally I do think they are one of the credible competitors.

are you seriously believe in that? when was last time they produced a model, that is at least in top 20?

Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills

#39
Palantir is giving me "Samaritan" vibes from the show: "Person of Interest".

For the ones who haven't watched this amazing show, here is a small Google AI summary:

Samaritan is the primary antagonist of the later seasons of the sci-fi series Person of Interest. It is a fictional, totalitarian artificial superintelligence created by Arthur Claypool. Unlike its counterpart, the Machine, Samaritan has no moral constraints, viewing human free will as a flaw requiring aggressive control and mass surveillance

Post reply on HN