Live data from Hacker News

The future of Flipper Zero development

blog.flipper.net

61–70 of 206 posts

Re: The future of Flipper Zero development

#61

Flipper Zero is one of the handiest little pieces of tech I’ve ever owned. Being able to copy RFID keys is occasionally fantastically useful.

Is... that possible? I thought the whole point is that those were a challenge-response specifically to avoid ever them disclosing over the air the material necessary to impersonate one.

In my old apartment I was able to copy my fob from my apartment office. In my new one I had to record the interaction with the door and was then able to open the door

Re: The future of Flipper Zero development

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My hypothesis, based purely on personal experience and what friends have told me. I am not a furry. I feel like infosec was one of the earliest "no one cares who you are if you have skills" user groups. Online, you were just a handle. Man, woman, both, neither, no one knew until if/when you met up IRL. Until then, all you had was your reputation. I think that led to people having a pretty good idea about the attitude…

The visibility is a huge part of it. It signals "it's okay to be yourself here" when most professional life, even in tech, is dominated by keeping up "professional" appearances.

That makes sense. And I do strongly believe in the "virtuous circle" bit: people who aren't OK with others being themselves tend not to feel comfortable at, or get invited back to, events. That would make it more comfortable for the next event's attendees, making it less pleasant for the remaining pains in the necks, and so on. I've participated in conversations like:

Q: Why do rightwing websites keep getting hacked?

A: Because none of the best infosec people want to work where their friends wouldn't be welcome.

Re: The future of Flipper Zero development

#64

> TL;DR: We've allocated resources to maintain Flipper Zero firmware and support community contributions. Is that the tldr? It sure sounds like it's still on minimal life support.

Why can't something be "done"?

Especially since, as that article describes, the "firmware" has a much more limited scope that it used to, now being mostly a loader for app rather that providing user functions.

Worrying about firmware development resources for a Flipper Zero seems a bit like concentrating on your bios instead of ongoing updates to Linux and the applications you use. Yeah, it's important, but it's probably exceedingly rare for the firmware here to need to change much.

Re: The future of Flipper Zero development

#65
post #33
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Given they’ve had several skirmishes with customs and law enforcement agencies around the world, this always struck me as similar to the “don’t talk about installing retail Switch games on the Switch modding Discord” type of deal - everyone knows you can do that, but allowing mentions in official channels opens us to liability and causes nothing but headaches for both us and for customers, so if you’re going to do th…

Its one thing to have a skid come in going "I wanna hack the RFID on the gubbmints's doors how can i do that?" Versus "we forked the firmware to include a wide range of pentesting tools" And then get banned for even saying the alternate firmware. And seriously, this little thing is a wonderful hacker multitool. You can seriously fuck shit up with the hardware they included. For fucks sake, thats WHY they created it.

Any advice on good communities or sources of (reliable) information on alternative firmwares and pen testing type tools?

Re: The future of Flipper Zero development

#67
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s definitely a meme if nothing else that the cybersecurity community has a distribution of furries that would not reflect the general population’s.

Is there some study to explain why? Do they feel more safer pretending to be human sized...furry animal?

Why would we need a study? It’s just escapism.

Re: The future of Flipper Zero development

#68
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there some study to explain why? Do they feel more safer pretending to be human sized...furry animal?

My hypothesis, based purely on personal experience and what friends have told me. I am not a furry. I feel like infosec was one of the earliest "no one cares who you are if you have skills" user groups. Online, you were just a handle. Man, woman, both, neither, no one knew until if/when you met up IRL. Until then, all you had was your reputation. I think that led to people having a pretty good idea about the attitude…

> Man, woman, both, neither, no one knew until if/when you met up IRL.

And sometimes not even then! Which is fine because indeed, who cares :)

Re: The future of Flipper Zero development

#69

[flagged]

Cause they like animals or the art style?

OK, so they’re furries.

I love animals. I’ve never once thought: “these humans in this picture should be replaced with anthropomorphised animals”.

This is peak “I read it for the articles”.

Re: The future of Flipper Zero development

#70

[flagged]

what does it matter to you? honest question. would that impact your technical assessment somehow? do you just want in on some probable joke?

Hi. Last I checked, one of the Hacker News rules isn’t “only have serious discussions regarding technical assessments. Failure to comply hereby entitles random people to fly off the handle and get very defensive”.
Post reply on HN