[flagged]
Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
81–90 of 172 posts
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#82[flagged]
I think this makes a lot of sense. The parents of my generation (I am in my 40s) saw no danger in sending their kids to a university where every professor and student peer was super-left. A lot of their kids (my peers) ended up unmarried and childless as per this article. So in a way those parents got punished by evolutionary forces for not being careful enough about their kids. I can guarantee you that those of my g…
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
The "power" of a country, however you define it, lags the population growth. China was the biggest country for decades, its power only really started exploding some 10 or 15 years ago.
And now its power is declining rapidly. Peter Zeihan "Don't be Surprised by China's Collapse": https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=8997844...
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#84[flagged]
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think this makes a lot of sense. The parents of my generation (I am in my 40s) saw no danger in sending their kids to a university where every professor and student peer was super-left. A lot of their kids (my peers) ended up unmarried and childless as per this article. So in a way those parents got punished by evolutionary forces for not being careful enough about their kids. I can guarantee you that those of my g…
Are you suggesting that no parents of your generation went to liberal schools?
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#86It seems the paper conflates "fertility" and "reproductive rate". Which is akin to conflating "soil fertility" and gross yields. It also seems many comments here have not picked up on that.
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#87When a bunch of demographic factors are all not just correlated but are linked to challenges in raising kids, it seems like elevating a single one of those factors is selective framing
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#88Everything about this thread is weird and woefully online. As an n of 1, we are surrounded by so many births that we just trade baby gear since we are either a handful of months ahead or behind many other parents. Our assumption was that we were in a stealth baby boom. Truly everyone we know has a minimum of one very young child with a high number of parents with between 2 and 4. It certainly runs counter to many onl…
Just a thought, based on my own experience. If you have children, or is about to have a baby, you start being around more parents or "parents to be". Either as part of parenting groups, in conjunction with daycare, schools or parents of your children's friends. Because this centers around your child, the children around you tends to be roughly the same age, plus or minus a few months.
It is an odd time for everyone to be really into kids but perhaps that is a species trigger for all we know
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#89Everything about this thread is weird and woefully online. As an n of 1, we are surrounded by so many births that we just trade baby gear since we are either a handful of months ahead or behind many other parents. Our assumption was that we were in a stealth baby boom. Truly everyone we know has a minimum of one very young child with a high number of parents with between 2 and 4. It certainly runs counter to many onl…
Where are you and what percentage of your neighbors go to church and similar.
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#90Everything about this thread is weird and woefully online. As an n of 1, we are surrounded by so many births that we just trade baby gear since we are either a handful of months ahead or behind many other parents. Our assumption was that we were in a stealth baby boom. Truly everyone we know has a minimum of one very young child with a high number of parents with between 2 and 4. It certainly runs counter to many onl…
This still runs contrary to national statistics, which would include these births unless there is a wave of children/births unregisted with the state. There is good public data on this, for example here: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr74/nvsr74-3.pdf That said, I think there is a perspective issue at play. It may seem like lots of people are having kids. A lot of our friends are too. However, I dint live thro…