Sigh. Reductionist thinking again. Yes, of course, if you literally say “small penis” the plaintiff would rightfully cite this history. But it’s not meant to be taken literally, like those are magic words. You say “he failed upwards, funded by family wealth and connections, despite everyone thinking he was an idiot who could barely string a sentence together” The point is to emphasize, even exaggerate, low-status neg…
It isn't the size of your tort, it is how you use it. Also, are men this easily manipulated? Yes.
Yes, I see you have produced a very small (re)tort, but arguably have used it well.