Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
1–10 of 172 posts
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#2Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#3It's not difficult to take that to the next logical conclusion, no children means less resources used.
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#4Oh great, Idiocracy as a scientific paper.
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#5Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#6Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#7Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#8And I think it's fair to say that in the US non-heterosexual people are overwhelmingly on the left, for fairly obvious reasons.
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#9[flagged]
That does not mean that it will work against all of them. Some high-fertility groups of today don't seem to be particularly prone to losing their members to left-wing or even just generic secular persuasion: there are very few ex-Amish or ex-Haredi leftists, and some, but not very many, ex-Muslim and ex-Mormon leftists.
Re: Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline
#10As an n of 1, we are surrounded by so many births that we just trade baby gear since we are either a handful of months ahead or behind many other parents. Our assumption was that we were in a stealth baby boom. Truly everyone we know has a minimum of one very young child with a high number of parents with between 2 and 4.
It certainly runs counter to many online discussions but reality often does.