SigMap: 97% token reduction for AI coding sessions
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: SigMap: 97% token reduction for AI coding sessions
#2I’m tempted to ask an LLM to parse this for me, as I don’t think I have the energy; maybe it’ll be able to suss out what it wrote.
Re: SigMap: 97% token reduction for AI coding sessions
#3Re: SigMap: 97% token reduction for AI coding sessions
#4This page could really any explanation for what this is? Even the “get started” link provides no real elucidation. Or maybe I’m just an idiot (also very possible). I’m tempted to ask an LLM to parse this for me, as I don’t think I have the energy; maybe it’ll be able to suss out what it wrote.
Re: SigMap: 97% token reduction for AI coding sessions
#5This page could really any explanation for what this is? Even the “get started” link provides no real elucidation. Or maybe I’m just an idiot (also very possible). I’m tempted to ask an LLM to parse this for me, as I don’t think I have the energy; maybe it’ll be able to suss out what it wrote.
From the package.json description.
Re: SigMap: 97% token reduction for AI coding sessions
#6This page could really any explanation for what this is? Even the “get started” link provides no real elucidation. Or maybe I’m just an idiot (also very possible). I’m tempted to ask an LLM to parse this for me, as I don’t think I have the energy; maybe it’ll be able to suss out what it wrote.
The github page gives some more insight: it seems to index your code base to reduce duplications/hallucinations during prompting by other AI tools.
Re: SigMap: 97% token reduction for AI coding sessions
#7This page could really any explanation for what this is? Even the “get started” link provides no real elucidation. Or maybe I’m just an idiot (also very possible). I’m tempted to ask an LLM to parse this for me, as I don’t think I have the energy; maybe it’ll be able to suss out what it wrote.
Re: SigMap: 97% token reduction for AI coding sessions
#8This page could really any explanation for what this is? Even the “get started” link provides no real elucidation. Or maybe I’m just an idiot (also very possible). I’m tempted to ask an LLM to parse this for me, as I don’t think I have the energy; maybe it’ll be able to suss out what it wrote.
> Extracts function & class signatures with TF-IDF ranking From the package.json description.