Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix

ui.shadcn.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 180 posts

Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix

#51

Post by deanc »

ricardobeat wrote: post #49

It’s getting tiring to hear at this point, but the Claude voice comes through clearly in this post, and it’s a little off-putting. If even an important product release doesn’t warrant full human attention, where will we draw the line?

Serious question, why does it matter to you? Maybe they wrote a draft and reviewed Claude's writing before publishing. Why are we trying to "call out" when AI is assisting us in our work? This is an open source project, not a F500 company. They have limited resources, maybe English isn't their first language.

Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix

#54

Post by nmstoker »

ricardobeat wrote: post #49

It’s getting tiring to hear at this point, but the Claude voice comes through clearly in this post, and it’s a little off-putting. If even an important product release doesn’t warrant full human attention, where will we draw the line?

I'm sure this received full human attention, even if they used a computer to help write it (be that more traditional text tools or more recent ones).

Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix

#55

Post by Wurlitzer »

esperent wrote: post #41
vmware508 wrote: post #32

My choice is https://www.skeleton.dev/

Why? There's a thousand component libraries, what makes this one stand out?

It uses Zag js for its primitives which is framework agonistic as opposed to Radix or Base UI. Shadcn is only for React. If you use Solid.js for example, Skeleton is an option for your design system.

Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix

#56

Post by lionkor »

deanc wrote: post #51
ricardobeat wrote: post #49

It’s getting tiring to hear at this point, but the Claude voice comes through clearly in this post, and it’s a little off-putting. If even an important product release doesn’t warrant full human attention, where will we draw the line?

Serious question, why does it matter to you? Maybe they wrote a draft and reviewed Claude's writing before publishing. Why are we trying to "call out" when AI is assisting us in our work? This is an open source project, not a F500 company. They have limited resources, maybe English isn't their first language.

Because it implies that the users of the AI don't understand that it's output is usually horseshit littered with enough good info to make it sound correct

Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix

#57

Post by dev_hugepages »

deanc wrote: post #51
ricardobeat wrote: post #49

It’s getting tiring to hear at this point, but the Claude voice comes through clearly in this post, and it’s a little off-putting. If even an important product release doesn’t warrant full human attention, where will we draw the line?

Serious question, why does it matter to you? Maybe they wrote a draft and reviewed Claude's writing before publishing. Why are we trying to "call out" when AI is assisting us in our work? This is an open source project, not a F500 company. They have limited resources, maybe English isn't their first language.

Because it sounds like the average LinkedIn poster and we don't want it to invade spaces outside LinkedIn.

Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix

#58

Post by IshKebab »

deanc wrote: post #51
ricardobeat wrote: post #49

It’s getting tiring to hear at this point, but the Claude voice comes through clearly in this post, and it’s a little off-putting. If even an important product release doesn’t warrant full human attention, where will we draw the line?

Serious question, why does it matter to you? Maybe they wrote a draft and reviewed Claude's writing before publishing. Why are we trying to "call out" when AI is assisting us in our work? This is an open source project, not a F500 company. They have limited resources, maybe English isn't their first language.

I think fundamentally it's just really annoying to read the same cringey LinkedIn style voice everywhere.

If you manage to write an AI assisted article that doesn't tediously follow the "what this means for you", "it's not this, it's that", "One thing. Two things. Three things." formula... I really doubt people would complain.

Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix

#59

Post by robmccoll »

deanc wrote: post #51
ricardobeat wrote: post #49

It’s getting tiring to hear at this point, but the Claude voice comes through clearly in this post, and it’s a little off-putting. If even an important product release doesn’t warrant full human attention, where will we draw the line?

Serious question, why does it matter to you? Maybe they wrote a draft and reviewed Claude's writing before publishing. Why are we trying to "call out" when AI is assisting us in our work? This is an open source project, not a F500 company. They have limited resources, maybe English isn't their first language.

Because I associate that style with "I have little to say, but I will say it in as many words as I possibly can"

Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix

#60

Post by fjdjshsh »

ricardobeat wrote: post #49

It’s getting tiring to hear at this point, but the Claude voice comes through clearly in this post, and it’s a little off-putting. If even an important product release doesn’t warrant full human attention, where will we draw the line?

I hate the marketing-selling-linkedn style as much as anyone, but I don't think it's an LLM thing in particular. It's a style that existed before LLMs and it's very easy to make LLMs avoid it with one or two prompt paragraphs.

For what it's worth, I didn't get that vibe reading this post.

Post reply on HN