Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
ui.shadcn.com
Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
1–10 of 180 posts
Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
#2Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
#3Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
#4Even if they’re more deterministic, I wonder if the days of codemods are numbered.
Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
#5Moving away from codemods and towards LLMs doing migration work is an interesting development. Even if they’re more deterministic, I wonder if the days of codemods are numbered.
Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
#6Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
#7Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
#8The copy paste approach may be easily modifiable but creates new problems - ie now there is an upgrade ai agent for something that should just be ticking up a version number.
Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
#9Re: Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix
#10For boring applications - do people prefer the copy paste approach of shadcn instead of a traditional ui library like mantine? The copy paste approach may be easily modifiable but creates new problems - ie now there is an upgrade ai agent for something that should just be ticking up a version number.
Vendoring your components gives you the best of both worlds. You get a full component library but retain the ability to modify them as you want.
Your AI agent claim doesn't make any sense either. When upgrading normally your component just gets rewritten on disk. When switching from radix to base ui, a more comprehensive approach is needed.