Live data from Hacker News

A peek into Reddit's anti-spam internals

lyra.horse

71–80 of 88 posts

Re: A peek into Reddit's anti-spam internals

#71
post #50

A lot of what they are doing now is around AI comments and posts, I know this because in some of my subreddits I have various automod filters that align with the way AI writes, I see it all the time where my automod removes something and reddit removes it again after (some kind of race condition), as well as tons of these accounts getting site wide bans. In case you didn't realise, a massive portion of content on red…

[dead]

Re: A peek into Reddit's anti-spam internals

#72
post #50

A lot of what they are doing now is around AI comments and posts, I know this because in some of my subreddits I have various automod filters that align with the way AI writes, I see it all the time where my automod removes something and reddit removes it again after (some kind of race condition), as well as tons of these accounts getting site wide bans. In case you didn't realise, a massive portion of content on red…

I suspect their IPO is a sign that they’re throwing in the towel existentially.

Re: A peek into Reddit's anti-spam internals

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember reading years ago about some corrupt mod in one of the image subreddits - he or his friend had started some image hosting site and had six different Reddit accounts that he used to upvote posts that used his site and downvote all other posts. It took people a long while to notice what he was up to.

the Unidan incident? iirc it only got noticed at the time because of an argument between him and Ecka6 which led to the somewhat famous "here's the thing you said a jackdaw is a crow" copypasta

Unidan doesn't fit the description. It must have been a different incident.

Re: A peek into Reddit's anti-spam internals

#75

I cannot emphasize strongly enough just how deeply pervasive the spam is at Reddit. I'm a mod at the ecommerce subreddit, and I've only caught some of the AI-powered marketing operations because in one particular campaign that was making fictional claims about things I had direct knowledge about. Once I looked into the post history, and started to untangle the web of accounts that formed a self-supporting community o…

I'm sure you love Reddit's decision to allow users to hide their post history.

The same as youtubes removal of dislikes and more recently they disabled search results with newest results first.

Now I ignore a user based on other criteria (account age post/comment karma + a 50 times compressed repost)

Re: A peek into Reddit's anti-spam internals

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This practice was perfected by gallowboob years ago. He would spam a link/pic/post and monitor, if the post didn’t gain traction, he would delete and post again as to not trigger protections against the same link being posted. He was a cancer on Reddit and I’m sure he still exists under different monikers. But now there are 100s of gallowboobs.

> He was a cancer on Reddit and I’m sure he still exists under different monikers. But now there are 100s of gallowboobs. Yep, for example: If you mention the name "TurboStrider27" on /r/Games, your comment gets shadowbanned.

Holy hell!! The fact that this name still rings out to me years later really says something! And at one point /r/Games was the gaming subreddit for more informed people (compared to /r/gaming). And then one day somebody pointed out a guy named “TurboStrider27” was responsible for a large amount of slop posts. Lo-and-behold, a majority of posts did come from him.

I had no idea this was implicitly permitted (and even supported) but it makes sense if it’s been ongoing for so long. It’s no accident.

Re: A peek into Reddit's anti-spam internals

#77
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There have been incidents where users who reported certain spambots were themselves banned for "report abuse". It's speculated the operators of those spambots pay money to Reddit to not be banned.

I have a 16 year old account and received my first account warning, ever, for reporting a user's comment (to reddit, not the sub) a single time and the admins disagreeing that it violated the guidelines. I have screenshots somewhere, but it basically said if I continued to abuse the report feature my account would be banned. Reddit is a publicly traded company and I sincerely doubt the company is taking some organize…

Granted they are publicly traded and sure organized racket money dwarves for a policy traded company. However, if we step back from the making money side, there are real sovereign reasons for wanting to explicitly and implicitly allow for bot networks to operate.

First and foremost is the destruction of organization of people. If you’ll recall, Reddit used to be an oasis of the internet. Growing up, I was always in awe of the intelligent and impactful discussions that would occur organically (something Hacker News can’t even rival). Now, it’s slop.

There is real value there that Reddit is offering the government. I’m sure other foreign governments (the globalists) also benefit from a weaker people. So I’d imagine it’s the kind of racket that is so high-up, secretive, and decentralized that there is no real culpability and everyone is aware (except the people).

Re: A peek into Reddit's anti-spam internals

#78

I cannot emphasize strongly enough just how deeply pervasive the spam is at Reddit. I'm a mod at the ecommerce subreddit, and I've only caught some of the AI-powered marketing operations because in one particular campaign that was making fictional claims about things I had direct knowledge about. Once I looked into the post history, and started to untangle the web of accounts that formed a self-supporting community o…

I can't even fathom how mods now handle all this. I was a mod for one of the top subreddits and it was hard back then, a few years before LLMs, and I only had to deal with URL submissions, not comments.

I also help moderate a forum and I noticed the spike in new user signups for spamming has sharply risen over the last two years or so. The majority are most likely using LLMs to automate this. So now we put new registered users into a shadow account where they can post and interact, but it's only visible to them and no one else on the forum for a probation period. It seems to work for now.

Re: A peek into Reddit's anti-spam internals

#79

I cannot emphasize strongly enough just how deeply pervasive the spam is at Reddit. I'm a mod at the ecommerce subreddit, and I've only caught some of the AI-powered marketing operations because in one particular campaign that was making fictional claims about things I had direct knowledge about. Once I looked into the post history, and started to untangle the web of accounts that formed a self-supporting community o…

I'm sure you love Reddit's decision to allow users to hide their post history.

They still let Google crawl, so [site:reddit.com "username"] can be instructive.

Re: A peek into Reddit's anti-spam internals

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember reading years ago about some corrupt mod in one of the image subreddits - he or his friend had started some image hosting site and had six different Reddit accounts that he used to upvote posts that used his site and downvote all other posts. It took people a long while to notice what he was up to.

the Unidan incident? iirc it only got noticed at the time because of an argument between him and Ecka6 which led to the somewhat famous "here's the thing you said a jackdaw is a crow" copypasta

According to Reddit lore, that was coincidental. The jackdaw/crow thread was simply his last pre-ban comment:

https://old.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/2cmdiq/whats_...>

Post reply on HN