Live data from Hacker News

Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says

reuters.com

241–250 of 299 posts

Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you believe a dude was wrongly punished, and to you justice would be for everyone else to also be wrongly punished? Kind of dumb tbh

My mind is not capable of the cognitive dissonance necessary to accept that billionaires get a slap on the wrist while mere mortals get police helicopters descending upon them. In order to maintain my mental health, I must have consistency. So either enforce the law the same way against everyone correctly and proportionally, or your law and its enforcement are illegitimate and shouldn't exist. If some activity is har…

Brother Kim Dotcom was worth about $200,000,000

Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says

#242
post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> even foreign companies competitive to key US companies. It's unfathomable to me that EU companies don't take the risk of industrial espionage from US more seriously

Not from China? One country has a recent track record of massive amounts of industrial espionage and one doesn't.

Well one thing is sure, before 1776, the USA didn't do any industrial espionage.

Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says

#243
post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> even foreign companies competitive to key US companies. It's unfathomable to me that EU companies don't take the risk of industrial espionage from US more seriously

Not from China? One country has a recent track record of massive amounts of industrial espionage and one doesn't.

There are so many Chinese open weights models that any company with resources can run them in-house (or with a trusted provider).

There might be some valid concerns about model alignment, but at least the model running in-house isn't going to conduct espionage.

Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says

#245

All remote AI are a massive security risk for individuals/companies/governments that may be targeted by the US government. It is likely that the US will get a live feed from each AI provider that they are inspecting in real time to identity things of interest, terrorist attacks or foreign government planning or even foreign companies competitive to key US companies. It will give them access to the though process in t…

> "Also if you are using local AI that you didn’t train yourself you can never be sure..." A local model you trained yourself seems about as good as you can do today. But it may not even be possible to fully trust a model you trained if you used untrusted data during training. As a user, you have to trust your coding agent AND inference provider AND models: https://jacob.gold/posts/coding-models-are-code/ https://www…

also there doesn't even need to be a model involved, agentic code harnesses with remote "instructions for the local computer" are technically backdoored by default.

Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says

#246
post #223
post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution are two such examples Generally Communist nations historically favored technological development to human life in the scale of millions, keep that in mind when we enter a new economic revolution

The Great Leap Forward wasn't "killing" people, which implies intent. It was just good old economic mismanagement. On a related note, around 300k people die in the US every year due to causes directly attributable to poverty. [0] In other words, ~a million every three years. Now what? [0] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10111231/

> The Great Leap Forward wasn't "killing" people, which implies intent. It was just good old economic mismanagement.

If both the USSR and the CCP had millions killed in the process of modernization, without stopping when knowing the death toll, maybe there's intent after all?

How would you describe the cultural revolution then? another case of economic mismanagement?

Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says

#247
post #16
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Alibaba has engineers in Hongkong, Singapore, North America. It’s a global corporation

when i was in hongkong, chatgpt and gemini were disabled. Maybe this has changed though. When I was in China, the corporate vpn (zscaler) routed traffic through hk

This has changed (in a nit-picky way) - Gemini is now generally available to the public in Hong Kong.

ChatGPT and Claude are not available. Generally my impression is that OpenAI isn't that anal about service providers reselling ChatGPT in Hong Kong, but Anthropic seems to really strict about the "no China" thingy.

Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says

#248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After they uploaded their code to private repositories on GitHub, Bitbucket etc since forever?. They trust GitHub not to read their code but they don't trust an AI from Microsoft not to read it? It would be schizophrenia

Big customers usually use GHE served on prem due to security concerns, no?

I really have no idea. I work only with small or at most medium sized companies. All of them put their code on a git server they don't own. All of them are concerned about AI companies looking at their code. They hope that at least they won't train their models with their code if they pay.

I think that the reasoning is: they trust the git company (whatever it is) not to sell their code. They are worried that their code goes into a model and somebody else could ask the model "write a service like XYZ" and it will regurgitate their code.

Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says

#249
post #21

Considering their massive distillation, if US companies stop publishing new models to the public, would China still be able to develop new open weight models?

I don't think China would strugle to scrape the internet for fresh data. And they constantly publish state of the art LLM research (see DS4 context compaction and cache tech). They have very capable tech giants. So while not being able to distill western models would probably have some impact, it's probably becoming lesser as time passes. We might even see Western LLMs distilling Chinese models soon. If they aren't a…

Everyone distills/copies training data.

A couple months ago when Anthropic was complaining about Chinese distillation, people found that Claude self-identified as "DeepSeek" when asked in Chinese:

https://x.com/stevibe/status/2026227392076018101

It's really a fiasco of massive hypocrisy at this point.

Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says

#250
post #246
post #223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Great Leap Forward wasn't "killing" people, which implies intent. It was just good old economic mismanagement. On a related note, around 300k people die in the US every year due to causes directly attributable to poverty. [0] In other words, ~a million every three years. Now what? [0] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10111231/

> The Great Leap Forward wasn't "killing" people, which implies intent. It was just good old economic mismanagement. If both the USSR and the CCP had millions killed in the process of modernization, without stopping when knowing the death toll, maybe there's intent after all? How would you describe the cultural revolution then? another case of economic mismanagement?

I noticed you haven't addressed my main point at all. What are the millions dying of poverty every few years in the US (in a country with like a quarter of the population!), a death toll that still hasn't been stopped?

Is there intent there as well?

Post reply on HN