Disrupting a publicly-traded Israeli company? Heads will roll on Monday. This will cause a disruption to all sorts of intelligence operations. The FBI didn’t get the memo apparently.
Should've emailed procurement first
FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, Popa Botnet
11–19 of 19 posts
Re: FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, Popa Botnet
#12Google is pulling up the ladder for other internet crawlers for search engines and AI. It also hurts privacy and anonymity taking away an option to hide your IP without being an obvious VPN exit point.
Just annoyed that tencent and others are using alternate channels.
Re: FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, Popa Botnet
#13Disrupting a publicly-traded Israeli company? Heads will roll on Monday. This will cause a disruption to all sorts of intelligence operations. The FBI didn’t get the memo apparently.
[deleted]
Re: FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, Popa Botnet
#14The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) said today it worked with industry partners to seize hundreds of domains associated with NetNut, a sprawling residential proxy service operated by the publicly-traded Israeli company Alarum Technologies [NASDAQ: ALAR].
[deleted]
Re: FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, Popa Botnet
#15> most of the no-name TV streaming boxes for sale on the major e-commerce websites either come pre-installed with residential proxy software, or require the installation of proxy SDKs in order to use the device
> Even people without TV streaming boxes can find their smart TVs enrolled in residential proxy networks, just by installing one of thousands of apps available for download on Samsung and LG smart TVs. In a report released last month, the proxy tracking company Spur found 42 percent of apps available for download via the webOS operating system on LG smart TVs include SDKs that turn one’s television into an always-on residential proxy node. More than a quarter of the apps made for Samsung’s Tizen operating system had similar residential proxy components, Spur found.
Most interesting part of the article for me. I wonder if people with a streaming box run into tor-exit-node type problems.
Re: FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, Popa Botnet
#16Are residential proxies illegal? Why is the FBI involved with civil actions?
It certainly should be when the end users are not doing it on purpose.
Re: FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, Popa Botnet
#17Google is pulling up the ladder for other internet crawlers for search engines and AI. It also hurts privacy and anonymity taking away an option to hide your IP without being an obvious VPN exit point.
This was more like a fraud where they misled end users into running proxies.
Re: FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, Popa Botnet
#18> most of the no-name TV streaming boxes for sale on the major e-commerce websites either come pre-installed with residential proxy software, or require the installation of proxy SDKs in order to use the device > Even people without TV streaming boxes can find their smart TVs enrolled in residential proxy networks, just by installing one of thousands of apps available for download on Samsung and LG smart TVs. In a re…
> I wonder if people with a streaming box run into tor-exit-node type problems.
Some definitely do.
One of my family members had a mobile app installed that turned their device into a resi proxy, and I started to get super frequent CAPTCHAs, which I thought was odd. I found out what was happening when our IP got banned from Wikipedia with the reason "believed to be a residential proxy"
Re: FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, Popa Botnet
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google shows netnut.com[1] being the same thing, so not sure it's the wrong domain. Maybe not the main one. Brian Krebs' comment on this[2]: > Pretty sure they're working on getting that domain too, but it's taking longer for some reason. Either way, they have dismantled the botnet's back end infrastructure, so for now it's not doing much. [1] https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Anetnut.com [2] https://www.linkedin…
WRT [1], you get a lot more results with https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Anetnut.io And if they didn't even grab the main domain that the service used, why so confident that they've totally dismantled the back end infrastructure?
I don't know about "totally dismantled" but it definitely had some impact.
> As a result of these developments, the Company is currently experiencing disruptions to a portion of its services. If these disruptions continue for an extended period, they are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations, financial results and its ability to provide certain services to its customers.
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/07/03/332182...