1. An airplane crashes, everyone dies. Clearly a bad thing. Not so quick. For the funeral industry this means additional business, a good thing. And this is true for a LOT [1] of things, they are not good or bad, right or wrong, their judgment depends on perspective and personal preferences. 2. Which means that there is generally no policy that makes everyone happy. So you need a party with a program that aims at fin…
Are you seriously suggesting that there are different acceptable perspectives on the first point? I think it's important to hold on to such things, that's how we get further and get agreement, to try to agree on fundamental principles. No reason to upset that balance by suggesting that a plane crash is ever preferable.
We Don't Have to Be This Bad at Improving Society
111–115 of 115 posts
Re: We Don't Have to Be This Bad at Improving Society
#112Re: We Don't Have to Be This Bad at Improving Society
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does it? There are plenty of disastrous decisions in the last 70 years at the level of major policies. There are plenty of failed projects. The west in general used to be a lot more efficient. IMO the main cause is exactly the problem the Soviet Union used to have, and China still does: centralisation.
What disasters, particularly relatively modern ones? This reads as massive cope because China has lifted ~800M people out of extreme poverty [1][2] and the transformation of the ordinary lives of Chinese people is almost unbelievable. More cope here is "yeah but that's Tier 1 cities". But look at rural life in small villages. Even 20 years ago people were still drawing water from wells and didn't have indoor plumbing…
Re: We Don't Have to Be This Bad at Improving Society
#114China seems to do a decent job of it. Why can't we?
Does it? There are plenty of disastrous decisions in the last 70 years at the level of major policies. There are plenty of failed projects. The west in general used to be a lot more efficient. IMO the main cause is exactly the problem the Soviet Union used to have, and China still does: centralisation.
Yet every major successful company is centralised. If centralisation works for capitalist organisations, why can't it work for geographical units?
Re: We Don't Have to Be This Bad at Improving Society
#115[flagged]
being successful is a liability? no, being a failure and a loser is a liability
Especially if your billionaire company have 1/3 of workforce on benefits coz you don't pay them enough
Also did you really created account just to defend billionaires ?