Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why are so many "AI evangelists" posting such insufferable content?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 51 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why are so many "AI evangelists" posting such insufferable content?

#13
post #3

[flagged]

It is a true hellscape. It is useful when looking for work, but that is about it. Though it isn't without comedy. Seeing former co-workers posting about their keys for success and about how they've made it when you know damned well that they do worse than mediocre work is always a laugh.

Re: Ask HN: Why are so many "AI evangelists" posting such insufferable content?

#15
The term of AI is definitely overused on the internet especially on social media platforms. One possible reason might be related to marketing.

The fundamental behind AI is the same thing behind traditional software systems. So for the “AI evangelists” — the needs to be recognized is much stronger than the needs to be a great software engineer.

I am using a metaphor, do you want to play soccer in the playground? Or do you want to be a great fan of soccer? Have you seen soccer evangelists to be great soccer players?

Re: Ask HN: Why are so many "AI evangelists" posting such insufferable content?

#16
post #14

Who unironically writes "thought leader" as their job description?

I just went to check-- I have 6 first-degree connections with the phrase "thought leader" in their title. This out of about 800 connections, all of which are people I've met in-person. Some real-world examples:

* "Independent Thought Leader and Consultant"

* "Strategy, Innovation, and Distruptive Technology thought leader in the Hyperscale/Cloud business"

* "AI Thought Leader + Founder at .ai"

* "C++ expert and agile process thought leader"

When expanded to 2nd degree connections, I get more than 10 pages of results when searching for the phrase "Thought Leader" (in quotes, so it's not a fuzzy search phrase).

Re: Ask HN: Why are so many "AI evangelists" posting such insufferable content?

#17

Maybe it's the mediocre people who are most excited about AI because they see it as equalizing them with more interesting and original people.

I think it’s more that they can’t recognize the downsides of AI. They work with AI and it’s so smart! And magical! They don’t have the expertise to recognize the problems in its output, and they’re confused by complaints. It looks like stubborn resistance to them, so they turn to evangelism to try to get people to “see the light.” They don’t engage with legitimate criticism because they don’t understand it.

(That and the normal herd of grifters who pile on to every fad.)

Post reply on HN