Turning this on by default is insane.
I am fine with this, and I will go as far as to say this is how most devs will be using agents soon (the big companies have already been using agents like this for 6-12 months.) I don't want my agent to pause on some inane question once I let it loose. I might not even be at my computer for that. Usually it makes the right decision anyways. If it doesn't I can always undo what it did. If you're worried about it getti…
Claude's AskUserQuestion: "No response after 60s – continued without an answer"
21–30 of 68 posts
Re: Claude's AskUserQuestion: "No response after 60s – continued without an answer"
#22Turning this on by default is insane.
I am fine with this, and I will go as far as to say this is how most devs will be using agents soon (the big companies have already been using agents like this for 6-12 months.) I don't want my agent to pause on some inane question once I let it loose. I might not even be at my computer for that. Usually it makes the right decision anyways. If it doesn't I can always undo what it did. If you're worried about it getti…
Re: Claude's AskUserQuestion: "No response after 60s – continued without an answer"
#23To each his own I guess. There was nothing more frustrating than walking away from a CC session you expected to churn away at for an hour and coming back to a user question sitting there. More useful would be just getting a list of clarifying questions at the end of the session along with how it answered itself to follow up with or not.
Re: Claude's AskUserQuestion: "No response after 60s – continued without an answer"
#24Just ran into this, and what the ACTUAL fuck were they thinking. And I can't turn it off, apparently?
They were thinking users won't find this setting to turn it on, so enable it by default and users that don't liker it can turn it off. The Ralph Wiggum and /goal software indicates that some users want the AI to plow forwards, guessing at what the user actually wants. Some users don't want that behavior, but Anthropic took guess that more people want it than don't. 60 seconds is too short though, imo.
Re: Claude's AskUserQuestion: "No response after 60s – continued without an answer"
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
In a way that isn't configurable and is on by default?
Reading the comments on the issue shows how to configure it "env": { "CLAUDE_AFK_TIMEOUT_MS" : " " } https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/73125#issue...
Re: Claude's AskUserQuestion: "No response after 60s – continued without an answer"
#26Turning this on by default is insane.
I am fine with this, and I will go as far as to say this is how most devs will be using agents soon (the big companies have already been using agents like this for 6-12 months.) I don't want my agent to pause on some inane question once I let it loose. I might not even be at my computer for that. Usually it makes the right decision anyways. If it doesn't I can always undo what it did. If you're worried about it getti…
Re: Claude's AskUserQuestion: "No response after 60s – continued without an answer"
#27edit: didn't read closely enough to realize this can't be disabled / think about the perverse incentives. seems bad actually
Re: Claude's AskUserQuestion: "No response after 60s – continued without an answer"
#28Turning this on by default is insane.
I am fine with this, and I will go as far as to say this is how most devs will be using agents soon (the big companies have already been using agents like this for 6-12 months.) I don't want my agent to pause on some inane question once I let it loose. I might not even be at my computer for that. Usually it makes the right decision anyways. If it doesn't I can always undo what it did. If you're worried about it getti…
Re: Claude's AskUserQuestion: "No response after 60s – continued without an answer"
#29Even if I am staring at the screen at the time, it's often impossible to study code and make a judgement call that quickly.
My point being, even for opt-in it can be too short - highlights how little consideration they put into it, just releasing slop in production.
Re: Claude's AskUserQuestion: "No response after 60s – continued without an answer"
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am fine with this, and I will go as far as to say this is how most devs will be using agents soon (the big companies have already been using agents like this for 6-12 months.) I don't want my agent to pause on some inane question once I let it loose. I might not even be at my computer for that. Usually it makes the right decision anyways. If it doesn't I can always undo what it did. If you're worried about it getti…
"I love lax security features therefore you should too." Defaults should be safe and risky action should be done at the user's own discretion
What this is referring to are those follow-up "here's two plausible alternative ways to do this, which one do you prefer?" questions you sometimes get, and usually at the beginning of a planning session when presumably you're still actively involved in the session. They get exponentially less likely as the turn goes on.
Maybe it's a good default, maybe it's not, I'll wait to pass judgment. But it's not security-related except in contrived scenarios you could construct where one side of an A-or-B UserQuestion has security implications that aren't caught by any other safeguard. I haven't ever really experienced that in practice.