there is no such thing as "near lossless"
There is, after you define what you’re ready to loose and understand the lossy space. That’s how we came up with mobile cellphones, audio and video codecs etc. Literally powering all modern devices we use.
Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
21–30 of 55 posts
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#22Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#23Hey breadislove; amazing article, I’ll be sending mixedbread an email in the morning that may interest you (email will be @pm.me) I have also been working in compression and performance engineering, and managed to get a 99+% compression unlock versus conventional approaches (100+KB down to 1KB) in the scenario of 30 minute massive multiplayer game replays for a “game+engine” I’m developing I think there’s a synergy b…
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#24Saying "Near lossless" to mean 90% accurate retrieval of saved vectors is simply a lie. Lossy-ness is binary, not something you can paper over with getting close enough. And 90% is not close. Sure, LLMs are all about gradient descent on noisy data sets so I guess this is acceptable in this field but that terminology usage still bothered me
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#25Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#26Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#27``` We evaluated several precision pairings across our internal retrieval benchmark suite. Scores are NDCG@10 averaged across the suite, scaled to 0–100. NDCG@10 (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain at rank 10) measures how well the top 10 results are ordered against the ideal ranking, rewarding relevant documents more when they appear higher, with 100 being a perfect ranking. The full-precision baseline averages 9…
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#28Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is, after you define what you’re ready to loose and understand the lossy space. That’s how we came up with mobile cellphones, audio and video codecs etc. Literally powering all modern devices we use.
Actually, all of those things are considered "lossy".
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#30``` We evaluated several precision pairings across our internal retrieval benchmark suite. Scores are NDCG@10 averaged across the suite, scaled to 0–100. NDCG@10 (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain at rank 10) measures how well the top 10 results are ordered against the ideal ranking, rewarding relevant documents more when they appear higher, with 100 being a perfect ranking. The full-precision baseline averages 9…