Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
1–10 of 55 posts
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#2[flagged]
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#3[flagged]
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#4[flagged]
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#5[dead]
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#6[flagged]
[deleted]
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#7[flagged]
100% reduction is impossible for something which should work, because -100% means it is now 0
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#8[flagged]
Reminds me of 'Learning to be me' by Greg Egan
Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#9Re: Asymmetric Quantization: Near-Lossless Retrieval with 97% Storage Reduction
#10The Pi compression algorithm is better.