21–30 of 122 posts
[0]https://pubs.rsc.org/sm/article-abstract/17/3/475/708006/Int...
[1]https://pubs.rsc.org/sm/article-supplement/708006/mov/d0sm01...
A bit of a tangent but I've read this phrase almost verbatim in another article[1] today: > "This study is really good," says Sunghwan Jung, a biophysicist at Cornell University who studies the mechanics of animal movements and was not involved with the research. It shows, he says, that the guts of these animals "are very special." The other article [1] quote: > It’s “an impressive step,” said Jack Szostak (opens a n…
A bit of a tangent but I've read this phrase almost verbatim in another article[1] today: > "This study is really good," says Sunghwan Jung, a biophysicist at Cornell University who studies the mechanics of animal movements and was not involved with the research. It shows, he says, that the guts of these animals "are very special." The other article [1] quote: > It’s “an impressive step,” said Jack Szostak (opens a n…
If someone hasn't submitted this for an Ig Nobel, it would be a calamity.
If someone hasn't submitted this for an Ig Nobel, it would be a calamity.
Does the ignoble exist for anything else besides making fun of easy targets, like a bunch of sniveling teenagers?
Its aim is to "honor achievements that first make people laugh, and then make them think".
If someone hasn't submitted this for an Ig Nobel, it would be a calamity.
If someone hasn't submitted this for an Ig Nobel, it would be a calamity.
Does the ignoble exist for anything else besides making fun of easy targets, like a bunch of sniveling teenagers?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does the ignoble exist for anything else besides making fun of easy targets, like a bunch of sniveling teenagers?
Never have I considered the ignoble to be making fun of anyone. It is recognizing real, if bizarre, research. Science asking some real questions that make you appreciate the wonder of the universe.