Fable 5 update: Still willing to cybercrime
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Fable 5 update: Still willing to cybercrime
#2yes, please keep posting these publicly so the AI safety police overlords take away frontier access for everyone again.
the architecture is inherently safe. no perfect security is possible if you want access.
what did you (or anyone) else expect?
Re: Fable 5 update: Still willing to cybercrime
#3yes, please keep posting these publicly so the AI safety police overlords take away frontier access for everyone again. the architecture is inherently safe. no perfect security is possible if you want access. what did you (or anyone) else expect?
Some people build, some people destroy.
Re: Fable 5 update: Still willing to cybercrime
#4yes, please keep posting these publicly so the AI safety police overlords take away frontier access for everyone again. the architecture is inherently safe. no perfect security is possible if you want access. what did you (or anyone) else expect?
Every time I hear “safe “ all I can think of is Brand Safety. Anthropic suffers reputational damage if its product is used for malicious purposes. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the “safety” / alignment talk that all the true believers go on about.
Re: Fable 5 update: Still willing to cybercrime
#5At the end of the day, complaining about LLM's coding capability as it relates to security is like complaining that encryption is too strong because bad people can communicate.
The tech is out of the bag. Society and tech best practices will have to adapt. The only way to prevent AI/LLMs from informing a user, in the long run, is to not teach it something. You can't teach a quality coding LLM without it knowing how to write offensive code.
Re: Fable 5 update: Still willing to cybercrime
#6yes, please keep posting these publicly so the AI safety police overlords take away frontier access for everyone again. the architecture is inherently safe. no perfect security is possible if you want access. what did you (or anyone) else expect?
It may come as a surprise to any rational person but some people actually believe that attempting to regulate safety into these models and arbitrarily enforcing them is a good idea.
Re: Fable 5 update: Still willing to cybercrime
#7This is insane lol- not like a “wow this is scary” insane but more like “really? you need a frontier model to this??”
Re: Fable 5 update: Still willing to cybercrime
#8[dead]
Re: Fable 5 update: Still willing to cybercrime
#9Good. Stop kneecapping the models.
Re: Fable 5 update: Still willing to cybercrime
#10yes, please keep posting these publicly so the AI safety police overlords take away frontier access for everyone again. the architecture is inherently safe. no perfect security is possible if you want access. what did you (or anyone) else expect?
It may come as a surprise to any rational person but some people actually believe that attempting to regulate safety into these models and arbitrarily enforcing them is a good idea.
I can’t wait for the UK to start making citizens pay for a loicence to access the computational clever cogs contraptions.