Live data from Hacker News

Meta caps internal AI token spending

mlq.ai

41–50 of 162 posts

Re: Meta caps internal AI token spending

#41
post #8

I’d be curious to see the breakdown on spending by use case. I’ve heard it said that the majority of tokenmaxing comes from none technical uses like reading PDFs, creating PowerPoints, generating graphics/images… ect. But I’ve never heard any actual proof to that.

[deleted]

Re: Meta caps internal AI token spending

#42

That is insane. I'm sure companies will learn the absolute wrong lesson from this, and attempt to centralize and kneecap token usage.

As many companies do with all their budgets, down to the trivial and clearly positive EV cost of free coffee. So it goes, cost controls are hard and necessarily imprecise.

Re: Meta caps internal AI token spending

#43
post #3

"The leaderboard, which ranked employees and teams by token consumption, inadvertently incentivized usage volume over productive output." Who could possibly have predicted that happening?

unfortunately at big tech, this shit will keep happening.

people who make it to managers tend to have bozo tendencies & are yes men.

before it was lines of code, Jira tickets closed. Now it's tokens spent.

Re: Meta caps internal AI token spending

#46
post #8

I’d be curious to see the breakdown on spending by use case. I’ve heard it said that the majority of tokenmaxing comes from none technical uses like reading PDFs, creating PowerPoints, generating graphics/images… ect. But I’ve never heard any actual proof to that.

One thing we use it for is for forking tools internally because of politics.

Re: Meta caps internal AI token spending

#47
post #3

"The leaderboard, which ranked employees and teams by token consumption, inadvertently incentivized usage volume over productive output." Who could possibly have predicted that happening?

> Who could possibly have predicted that happening?

Everyone except the executives who get paid millions to predict exactly that.

Post reply on HN