Earlier quoted context omitted.
They might be sending some user requests to Anthropic to gather trading data for their own models. If they do so, perhaps they need to add some tracer to request that they prefer to hide.
Source? Or is it "trust me bro"?
ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2
91–100 of 382 posts
Re: ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you think the US has an "abysmal" track record on this, what words would you use to describe China's track record?
also abysmal. two things can be bad at the same time
Re: ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree. I don't find the US competitors trustworthy either. I think open source is the way here.
Thank you. It doesn't make sense to me how much people trust our companies so much more than Chinese ones for no reason. This country has an abysmal track record when it comes to respecting its citizen's rights or privacy. Propaganda working as intended I suppose.
Re: ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree. I don't find the US competitors trustworthy either. I think open source is the way here.
Thank you. It doesn't make sense to me how much people trust our companies so much more than Chinese ones for no reason. This country has an abysmal track record when it comes to respecting its citizen's rights or privacy. Propaganda working as intended I suppose.
I also consider Microsoft to be the biggest industrial spy in the world, them and google both are no doubt mining everything you type into office / gsuite, all your emails, etc. But nobody bats an eye when you write a word doc about some sensitive matter.
If my customers thought I was feeding their data into a Chinese owned LLM API (which to be clear I’m not), I don’t think it would go over well, and I’d be exposed legally to all sorts of things.
So the reason is risk aversion and desire to participate in US / western commerce. One can debate the actual threat, but why would you ever risk sending your data to a processor perceived as dodgy?
Re: ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
What kinds of tasks does Opus refuse? I’m a light daily user for the past 3 months and Opus has never refused a task for me.
I’ve never had a refusal coding, and in some areas (AI red teaming specifically) I’ve found it quite good at recognizing and discussing “white hat” stuff that in the past I think would have got refusals. But when there was the Hantavirus thing a while back, I asked it if there was a vaccine under development and got a refusal immediately. I’ve had a few like that. It seems they’ve implemented really poor guardrails o…
Re: ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you. It doesn't make sense to me how much people trust our companies so much more than Chinese ones for no reason. This country has an abysmal track record when it comes to respecting its citizen's rights or privacy. Propaganda working as intended I suppose.
If you think the US has an "abysmal" track record on this, what words would you use to describe China's track record?
Re: ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you. It doesn't make sense to me how much people trust our companies so much more than Chinese ones for no reason. This country has an abysmal track record when it comes to respecting its citizen's rights or privacy. Propaganda working as intended I suppose.
If you think the US has an "abysmal" track record on this, what words would you use to describe China's track record?
Suppose a US citizen, residing and working in the US and never traveling to China, crosses The Powers That Be. Which Power is more likely to do worse things to said citizen? Pretty unlikely they'll be rendered to one of the illegal Chinese jails in Brooklyn, more likely they'll be sent to Gitmo or a black site.
Re: ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2
#98I don't find a closed-source Chinese agent system trustworthy. It is essentially a black box with full user permissions, meaning you are just handing over your entire system to a Chinese-owned server. With OpenCode and its GLM provider, at least I can monitor which files were read, which were edited, and what commands were executed. Not to mention that Chinese national security laws legally obligate companies to coop…
Re: ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2
#99Yea not touching this with an any-foot pole. They are just keeping up with the Joneses now. There is no reason for this to exist but there IS a reason it is not open source. ;)
Re: ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2
#100UI-wise this looks a lot closer to Codex than Claude Code. It's basically an exact copy of Codex.