Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
support.claude.com
Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
1–10 of 103 posts
Re: Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
#2Took em long enough! Now to see how many turns I get on Max 20x before it's effectively inaccessible indefinitely for me.
Re: Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
#3It's back baby! runs script to submit the 50 prompts I prepared overnight
Re: Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
#4[deleted]
Re: Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
#5I wonder what brought them into compliance.
Re: Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
#6I wonder what brought them into compliance.
the classifier is very picky, working with languages such as C I get cyber refusals and random reasoning_extraction errors.
Re: Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
#7From the original announcement last month:
> After this point-when sufficient capacity allows us to do so—we aim to restore Fable 5 as a standard part of subscription plans. We intend to do this as quickly as we can.
From today:
> After July 7, 2026, Claude Fable 5 is no longer included in your plan’s weekly usage limits. You can keep using Claude Fable 5 through usage credits, which let you pay for usage beyond what your plan includes.
Re: Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
#8I'm so disappointed that Anthropic are jerking us around so much with Fable. Really makes me feel like cattle they're unsubtly milking.
Re: Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
#9"promotion" like they are doing you a favor just this once out of their goodwill... Really really really pissed me off
Re: Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access
#10I'm disappointed with this. Historically, Claude's API cost a significant multiple of their subscription pricing, and after the promotional period it appears the access to Fable will be API only, if I understand this.
There actually is a limit to what people will pay for model usage, and I suppose this squeeze is one way to find out what that limit is. I've been content paying $200 per month for a solid plan that I actually don't quite use up every month, but this new vector really rubs me the wrong way.