Live data from Hacker News

How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster

probelab.io

11–20 of 69 posts

Re: How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster

#11
post #7

I'll add to the "is it still...?" questions. Last I was told about it, there was no way to delete stuff from IPFS. Nothing enforceable, at least. Setting aside that public stuff is "impossible" to delete on the internet, there's something appealing to me about being able to shut off my server. Feels like that is less possible with IPFS hosted content. Does anyone have some perspective for me about removing content?

Imagine you created a torrent (and/or magnet link) with a file and then stopped seeding after some time. If it was popular it will probably live on, if not then eventually it disappears.

Re: How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster

#13
post #11
post #7

I'll add to the "is it still...?" questions. Last I was told about it, there was no way to delete stuff from IPFS. Nothing enforceable, at least. Setting aside that public stuff is "impossible" to delete on the internet, there's something appealing to me about being able to shut off my server. Feels like that is less possible with IPFS hosted content. Does anyone have some perspective for me about removing content?

Imagine you created a torrent (and/or magnet link) with a file and then stopped seeding after some time. If it was popular it will probably live on, if not then eventually it disappears.

Thanks! Yeah, I kind of figured that was still the case. Not really any use cases I have that I would feel comfortable with that paradigm, but I'm glad it's available!

Re: How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster

#14

Is anyone still (or has anyone ever) used IPFS in production? I’m not talking about technology demos such as Wikipedia-on-IPFS (which indeed worked and was impressive) but where IPFS is actually being relied on for some functionality.

It's funny because even in Piracy, IPFS has never really taken off and that's a massive use case.

Re: How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster

#15

Is anyone still (or has anyone ever) used IPFS in production? I’m not talking about technology demos such as Wikipedia-on-IPFS (which indeed worked and was impressive) but where IPFS is actually being relied on for some functionality.

It doesn't seem like it's popular to put old game ROMs on IPFS...? And that surprises me...

Re: How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster

#16

Is anyone still (or has anyone ever) used IPFS in production? I’m not talking about technology demos such as Wikipedia-on-IPFS (which indeed worked and was impressive) but where IPFS is actually being relied on for some functionality.

https://swap.cow.fi uses it for order metadata registering iirc

Re: How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster

#17

Is anyone still (or has anyone ever) used IPFS in production? I’m not talking about technology demos such as Wikipedia-on-IPFS (which indeed worked and was impressive) but where IPFS is actually being relied on for some functionality.

NFT artwork, if you count that. Briefly checked, the ones that were traded for the most were using IPFS rather than HTTP. But I also don't trust that these aren't self-wash sales (easy given the "NF" part), also NFTs are dumb.

Re: How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster

#18

Is anyone still (or has anyone ever) used IPFS in production? I’m not talking about technology demos such as Wikipedia-on-IPFS (which indeed worked and was impressive) but where IPFS is actually being relied on for some functionality.

It's funny because even in Piracy, IPFS has never really taken off and that's a massive use case.

Also public key lists like what Whatsapp now publishes

Re: How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster

#19

Is anyone still (or has anyone ever) used IPFS in production? I’m not talking about technology demos such as Wikipedia-on-IPFS (which indeed worked and was impressive) but where IPFS is actually being relied on for some functionality.

NFT artwork, if you count that. Briefly checked, the ones that were traded for the most were using IPFS rather than HTTP. But I also don't trust that these aren't self-wash sales (easy given the "NF" part), also NFTs are dumb.

I don’t think NFTs (should) count: My first impressions of web3 by Moxie Marlinspike

https://moxie.org/2022/01/07/web3-first-impressions.html

Re: How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster

#20

Is anyone still (or has anyone ever) used IPFS in production? I’m not talking about technology demos such as Wikipedia-on-IPFS (which indeed worked and was impressive) but where IPFS is actually being relied on for some functionality.

It's funny because even in Piracy, IPFS has never really taken off and that's a massive use case.

It slowly was taking off—e.g. Library Genesis on IPFS[0]—but then IPFS introduced Bad Bits Denylist [1] which killed it on arrival.

[0] https://freeread.org/ipfs.html

[1] https://badbits.dwebops.pub/

Post reply on HN