Live data from Hacker News

Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

thefocalpoints.com

41–50 of 207 posts

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#44
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AGI is clearly right around the corner. It might not be able to make an accurate diagram of a cancer research study but it’s gonna cure cancer in no time…

~~I wouldn't be so sure about "clearly". We're still very squarely in the "fancy auto-complete" stage of "AI", the name of which I still consider more branding than reality.~~ Edit: Ignore me, I'm sleepy and can't read, lol

The person you’re replying to was being glib

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#45

Mice are having a great year

Hmm, mice get much impressive medical results to be linked to here and there, but overall it’s not certain the species benefit that much in happiness and fulfilment.

The pride and sense of achievement they ought to feel that members of their kind did something should be enough to feel superior though

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#47

We are destroying ecosystems so fast that there will be no frogs and we will regret it. The same with all the nature

We get what we deserve. We let the top 1% destroy our planet and also let them live the longest in their bunkers, while we deal with the repercussions of not having done enough. But I've noticed that folks on HN are very very fond of capitalism, so it's no point arguing against it on here and on the effects of wealth accumulation and greed.

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#48
post #40

The blog is highly suspect, but the study is real. That said it’s not a big deal. Curing cancer in a mouse model is not at all uncommon in new therapies. Mouse models like this are vastly easier to treat than real world cancer for a bunch of reasons. Fully curing mice is the baseline for a treatment to even be considered for further evaluation. And even then very few therapies end up succeeding in humans - low single…

When my mother was fighting cancer, I recall the many disappointments of finding research shrinking tumours in animal models, only to find out the human research showing it didnt work in humans. This was in the 2010s, before llms, but when google search actually searched the web. Then, once you found something that seemed to work in humans, you were hit with the realization that ‘cancer’ is an umbrella term, and you need to account for cell type, and its numerous mutations.. I think the best approach is to collect a sample of the cancer, genotype it, test it against all known anticancer compounds, similar to how you’d deal with a bacterial infection sample, and then hope that the compound that worked for that specific cancer cell will work inside the human

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#49
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AGI is clearly right around the corner. It might not be able to make an accurate diagram of a cancer research study but it’s gonna cure cancer in no time…

~~I wouldn't be so sure about "clearly". We're still very squarely in the "fancy auto-complete" stage of "AI", the name of which I still consider more branding than reality.~~ Edit: Ignore me, I'm sleepy and can't read, lol

How in the world did you miss such obvious sarcasm?

Re: Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice

#50

We are destroying ecosystems so fast that there will be no frogs and we will regret it. The same with all the nature

We get what we deserve. We let the top 1% destroy our planet and also let them live the longest in their bunkers, while we deal with the repercussions of not having done enough. But I've noticed that folks on HN are very very fond of capitalism, so it's no point arguing against it on here and on the effects of wealth accumulation and greed.

People here strive to be the ones hiding in the bunkers as the world burns.
Post reply on HN