How information theory saved my word game
motplot.app
How information theory saved my word game
1–10 of 32 posts
Re: How information theory saved my word game
#2Re: How information theory saved my word game
#3Information theory has been a really fascinating topic to get more acquainted with. Not really related to the crossword, but I highly recommend 3Blue1Brown's video "Compression is Intelligence", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6DKRf-fAAM
While intelligence and compression both may have similar goals (to optimize paths of information), intelligence negotiates probability (allowing multiple divergent outcomes) while compression requires an idempotent symbolic translation.
Re: How information theory saved my word game
#4> I didn’t arrive there as a mathematician; I’m not one.
> This wasn’t a speed problem I could optimise away. It was a wall, and it asked a question I couldn’t answer
Very strong LLM whiff. A line of thought that constantly, constantly turns back on itself, negating and doubting and qualifying in one way or another, is the biggest tell (the classic "It's not X, it's Y," is only the baldest example).
Noticing that whiff instantly turns me off from reading on.
Re: How information theory saved my word game
#5> Marshall McLuhan gets the credit for the medium is the message, but Claude Shannon had beaten him to a colder version of it years earlier: to a machine moving your words, the meaning doesn’t matter at all; only the medium does, and which of its signals can be told apart. Bravo and Delta survive a bad line; B and D don’t. > I didn’t arrive there as a mathematician; I’m not one. > This wasn’t a speed problem I could…
Re: How information theory saved my word game
#6Information theory has been a really fascinating topic to get more acquainted with. Not really related to the crossword, but I highly recommend 3Blue1Brown's video "Compression is Intelligence", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6DKRf-fAAM
Compression is not intelligence. While intelligence and compression both may have similar goals (to optimize paths of information), intelligence negotiates probability (allowing multiple divergent outcomes) while compression requires an idempotent symbolic translation.
What does this mean?
Lossy, non-deterministic compression is a thing. Does that meet the "allowing multiple divergent outcomes" criteria?
Re: How information theory saved my word game
#7> Marshall McLuhan gets the credit for the medium is the message, but Claude Shannon had beaten him to a colder version of it years earlier: to a machine moving your words, the meaning doesn’t matter at all; only the medium does, and which of its signals can be told apart. Bravo and Delta survive a bad line; B and D don’t. > I didn’t arrive there as a mathematician; I’m not one. > This wasn’t a speed problem I could…
Re: How information theory saved my word game
#8> Marshall McLuhan gets the credit for the medium is the message, but Claude Shannon had beaten him to a colder version of it years earlier: to a machine moving your words, the meaning doesn’t matter at all; only the medium does, and which of its signals can be told apart. Bravo and Delta survive a bad line; B and D don’t. > I didn’t arrive there as a mathematician; I’m not one. > This wasn’t a speed problem I could…
> This wasn’t a speed problem I could optimise away. It was a wall
Re: How information theory saved my word game
#9Re: How information theory saved my word game
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This wasn’t a speed problem I could optimise away. It was a wall
Well it certainly was a wall. That's how I kept describing it to my partner, I was hitting a wall.
I liked the post, I just don't like Claude writing every article I read, just like I didn't like every website I visited looking like Bootstrap.