Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban
41–50 of 207 posts
Re: Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban
#42Re: Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban
#43If you really want to make an impact on the noise floor, ban gasoline leaf blowers.
Re: Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban
#44If you really want to make an impact on the noise floor, ban gasoline leaf blowers.
Re: Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban
#45Re: Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban
#46Re: Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
My parents immigrated to the US in the 80s. They didn't steal anyone's land. Can I complain about rich people wasting fuel, polluting the air, and creating peace-shattering sounds? And about the stolen land, what should we do about it? Never complain about anything? Have no laws? Give all of your stolen land back, make all the reparations you owe people, and then go back to lecturing people online.
By immigrating, your parents(and you) took on the shared responsibility for the countries wrongdoings and great deeds. When people talk about this stuff, it isn't about apportioning blame. I'm not big on the stolen land thing because it's turtles all the way down, but this idea of divvying up blame makes no sense. We are all citizens.
I don't agree with this point of view either.
Re: Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Yep!!! It really has changed and has become exhausting. The most flippant, negative, cynical, and antagonistic replies nowadays, rather than genuine curiosity about the news or optimism. Too bad because HN has been my “home” on the internet for 15 years.
Re: Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban
#490.11 pound per square foot is what is being proposed. That's 108 decibels. Which is between standing next to a lawn mower and standing next to a car horn. I don't see how anyone will tolerate that in practice. https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/db
It’s not accurate to convert .1 psf to dB because it’s an impulsive shape, not a continuous tone. And human loudness perception depends on how smooth (low frequency) the shape is
Sorry can you explain more? It's just the definition of dB (?)
And it's less impulsive than you imagine, go to youtube to listen to the sonic boom + continuous roar.
The FAA has no criteria about the "texture" of the sound and there is no reason to believe the allowed planes will differ substantially in this respect compared to every other supersonic aircraft in the past.
Re: Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban
#50If you really want to make an impact on the noise floor, ban gasoline leaf blowers.