Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that should be illegal and misrepresenting. Lots of gray area with AI usage.
[flagged]
[deleted]
Nano Banana 2 Lite
31–40 of 214 posts
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#32Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that should be illegal and misrepresenting. Lots of gray area with AI usage.
[flagged]
I'm not sure if you're being serious but it should be illegal because they're producing images that are often not physically possible. At least if an agent stages an apartment with real furniture they are doing something a tenant really could do. But these AI images tend to change the physical dimensions of a room, use images of furniture that don't make sense dimensionally, shift the "natural" light of the room in a way that the sun will never provide and sometimes even change the view through the windows of the room.
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#34Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#35I received early access to test this model. (through work — Google still does not like me personally lol) It works as advertised here, and it does behave like a distilled Nano Banana 2 with respect to certain elements such as good text rendering, which Nano Banana 1 does much worse with. It is definitely not at the level of the base Nano Banana 2 of course particularly with highly-nuanced prompts. My main criticism i…
What kind of work are you doing that requires automated image generation at scale?
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#36They didnt include chatgpt in the comparison chart. That tells a lot
That is fair to point out. For those who don't know, ChatGPT Image 2 has an absurd ELO of 1387; compared to the #2 model at 1273, it's over 100 points higher ( https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text-to-image ). The tradeoff is latency, and ChatGPT Image 2 at High is...slow (~2 minutes at 1024x1024). In both cases it would have skewed the charts here to uselessness. I want to do a writeup on ChatGPT Image 2 but at this poi…
That arena leaderboard has some questionable results. Anyone who's used these models would know that ranking HiDream above Krea2 is a pretty hot take.
Many of these ELO comparative tests (ArtificialAnalysis is guilty as hell on this as well) also have other problems such as a considerable number of "amateur judges" tending to prioritize aesthetics over actual instruction-following given the prompt.
Also (less a critique of Arena.AI necessarily), but the MAI models are so incredibly locked down (e.g. censored) as to be functionally useless. I have a sneaking suspicion its fallout from Tay.
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#37[deleted]
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I'm not sure if you're being serious but it should be illegal because they're producing images that are often not physically possible. At least if an agent stages an apartment with real furniture they are doing something a tenant really could do. But these AI images tend to change the physical dimensions of a room, use images of furniture that don't make sense dimensionally, shift the "natural" light of the room in a…
I think their last sentence is a pretty clear indicator that they were not being serious.